Revision as of 21:09, 15 July 2015 editWavelength (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers179,502 edits MOS:HOWEVERPUNC—Radio announcers, please pause. Radio listeners, please wait. Please do not confuse the adverb "however" with the conjunction "but".← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:35, 27 June 2016 edit undoGuy1890 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers29,093 edits Some minor edits.Next edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
==References== | |||
<references /> | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* {{lexum-scc2|1990|1|1123|105}} | * {{lexum-scc2|1990|1|1123|105}} | ||
{{Prostitution in Canada}} | {{Prostitution in Canada}} | ||
{{italic title}} | {{italic title}} | ||
Line 18: | Line 24: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
{{Canada-law-stub}} | {{Canada-law-stub}} |
Revision as of 04:35, 27 June 2016
Reference re ss. 193 & 195.1(1)(c) of Criminal Code (Canada), (the Prostitution Reference), 1 S.C.R. 1123 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and on prostitution in Canada. The Court held that the criminal code provision that prohibited communication for the purpose of engaging in prostitution was in violation of the right to freedom of expression; however, it could be justified under section 1 of the Charter and so it was upheld.
The majority on a 5:2 split, with both women dissenting, found that the purpose of eliminating prostitution was a valid goal and that the provision was rationally connected and proportional to that goal. Accordingly, the provision was upheld.
See also
References
External links
- Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision at LexUM and CanLII
Prostitution in Canada | |||
---|---|---|---|
Law | |||
Organizations |
| ||
People | |||
Media | |||
Neighbourhoods | |||
Other |
This article about Canadian law is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |