| Revision as of 23:46, 30 August 2015 editOgress (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers51,186 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Anatta. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:49, 30 August 2015 edit undoOgress (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers51,186 edits Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 23:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC) | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 23:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
| == Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] ] 23:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:49, 30 August 2015
Your edit to DJ Paul
Your recent edit to DJ Paul (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
September 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Lexington Township, Scott County, Indiana. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IGeMiNix (talk) 00:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
August 2015
Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Anatta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
DOCTRINE IS A RELIABLE SOURCE, OR ARE YOU BRAIN-DEAD?
- Hello, I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil. Misplaced Pages needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anatta, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 23:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
DO NOT REMOVE DOCTRINAL CITATIONS
ALL STATEMENTS ARE CITED, I HAVE PROOF, YOU HAVE NOTHING.
END OF STORY, YOURE A NIHILISTIC TROLL WITH AN AGENDA.
RELIABLE SOURCE IN A RELIGION DEBATE? DOCTRINE
DO YOU TRANSLATE PALI? NO
DO YOU KNOW DOCTRINE? NO
DO YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE TERM ANATTA? NO
CITE YOUR EVIDENCES? YOU HAVE NONE.
ERGO, YOURE A TROLL
Hello, I'm Ogress. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Anatta without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ogress smash! 23:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history at Anatta shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ogress smash! 23:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:74.130.113.160 reported by User:Ogress (Result: ). Thank you. Ogress smash! 23:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)