Misplaced Pages

Demographics of Tunisia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:01, 23 September 2015 editPinkbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,741 edits revert to version supported with cites. Please DO NOT return to the uncited version. Cites first, article second.← Previous edit Revision as of 23:04, 26 September 2015 edit undo41.137.74.62 (talk) best summerNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The majority (99% <ref name=report>. United States ] (September 14, 2007). ''This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the ].''</ref>) of modern Tunisians are ] or ],<ref>Muhammad Aurang Zeb Mughal (2012) . Steven Danver (ed.), ''Native Peoples of the World: An Encyclopedia of Groups, Cultures, and Contemporary Issues'', Vol. 3. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp.&nbsp;688–689.</ref> and are speakers of ]. However, there is also a small (1 percent at most) minority of pure native ] located mainly in the Jabal Dahar mountains in the South East and on the island of ]. The Berbers primarily speak ], often called ] or Tashlihit,<ref></ref> or have shifted to Tunisian Arabic. The majority (98% <ref name="autogenerated1"></ref>) of modern Tunisians are ] or ], and are speakers of ]. However, there is also a small (1 percent at most<ref name="autogenerated1" />) of pure native ] located mainly in the Jabal Dahar mountains in the South East and on the island of ]. The Berbers primarily speak ], often called ],<ref></ref> or have shifted to Tunisian Arabic.
]; Number of inhabitants in thousands.]] ]; Number of inhabitants in thousands.]]


Nearly all Tunisians (99 percent of the population) are Muslim.<ref name="CIA">{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ts.html#People |title=CIA – The World Factbook — Tunisia |accessdate=2007-01-13 |work= }}</ref> There is a Jewish population on the southern island of ] and ]. There is also a small indigenous ] population.<ref>http://france-echos.com/actualite.php?cle=6174</ref><ref name="report"/> Nearly all Tunisians (98 percent of the population) are Muslim.<ref name="CIA">{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ts.html#People |title=CIA – The World Factbook — Tunisia |accessdate=2007-01-13 |work= }}</ref> There is a Jewish population on the southern island of ] and ]. There is also a small indigenous ] population.<ref>http://france-echos.com/actualite.php?cle=6174</ref>


==Population== ==Population==
{|class="wikitable"
{{Historical populations
|-
|title = Historical population
!Year||Population||{{abbr|%±|Percent change}}
|align = left
|-
|shading = off
|July 1, 2007
|percentages = pagr
|style="text-align:center;"|10,225,100
|1960 |4220701
| —
|1970 |5127000
|-
|1980 |6384000
|July 1, 2008
|1990 |8154400
|style="text-align:center;"|10,328,900
|2000 |9563500
| +1.02%
|2010 |10547000
|-
|2013 |10886500
|July 1, 2009
|2014 |10982754
|style="text-align:center;"|10,439,600
}}
| +1.07%
|-
|July 1, 2010
|style="text-align:center;"|10,547,100
| +1.03%
|-
|July 1, 2011
|style="text-align:center;"|10,673,800
| +1.20%
|-
|July 1, 2012
|style="text-align:center;"|10,777,500
| +0.97%
|-
|}
Source: National Institute of Statistics<ref name="INS"></ref> Source: National Institute of Statistics<ref name="INS"></ref>

=== Vital statistics ===


{| class="wikitable" {| class="wikitable"
Line 157: Line 170:
| 2002 | 2002
| align="right" | 9 748 900 | align="right" | 9 748 900
| align="right" | 163 011 | align="right" |
| align="right" | | align="right" |
| align="right" | | align="right" |
Line 167: Line 180:
| 2003 | 2003
| align="right" | 9 839 800 | align="right" | 9 839 800
| align="right" | 168 022 | align="right" |
| align="right" | | align="right" |
| align="right" | | align="right" |
Line 177: Line 190:
| 2004 | 2004
| align="right" | 9 932 400 | align="right" | 9 932 400
| align="right" | 166 551 | align="right" |
| align="right" | | align="right" |
| align="right" | | align="right" |
Line 187: Line 200:
| 2005 | 2005
| align="right" | 10 029 000 | align="right" | 10 029 000
| align="right" | 170 999 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 58 673 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 112 326 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 17.1 | align="right" | 17.1
| align="right" | 5.9 | align="right" | 5.9
Line 197: Line 210:
| 2006 | 2006
| align="right" | 10 127 900 | align="right" | 10 127 900
| align="right" | 173 390 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 57 000 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 116 390 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 17.1 | align="right" | 17.1
| align="right" | 5.6 | align="right" | 5.6
Line 207: Line 220:
| 2007 | 2007
| align="right" | 10 225 100 | align="right" | 10 225 100
| align="right" | 177 503 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 56 741 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 120 762 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 17.4 | align="right" | 17.4
| align="right" | 5.5 | align="right" | 5.5
Line 217: Line 230:
| 2008 | 2008
| align="right" | 10 328 900 | align="right" | 10 328 900
| align="right" | 182 990 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 59 975 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 123 015 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 17.7 | align="right" | 17.7
| align="right" | 5.8 | align="right" | 5.8
Line 227: Line 240:
| 2009 | 2009
| align="right" | 10 439 600 | align="right" | 10 439 600
| align="right" | 184 282 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 59 499 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 124 783 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 17.7 | align="right" | 17.7
| align="right" | 5.7 | align="right" | 5.7
Line 237: Line 250:
| 2010 | 2010
| align="right" | 10 547 100 | align="right" | 10 547 100
| align="right" | 196 039 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 60 438 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 135 601 | align="right" |
| align="right" | 18.6 | align="right" | 18.6
| align="right" | 5.7 | align="right" | 5.7
Line 247: Line 260:
| 2011 | 2011
| align="right" | 10 673 800 | align="right" | 10 673 800
| align="right" | 201 120
| align="right" | 63 258
| align="right" | 137 862
| align="right" | 18.8
| align="right" | 5.9
| align="right" | 12.9
| align="right" | 2.15
|-
| 2012
| align="right" | 10 777 500
| align="right" | 208 006 (e)
| align="right" | 67 898 (e)
| align="right" | 140 108 (e)
| align="right" | 19.3
| align="right" | 6.3
| align="right" | 13.0
| align="right" | 2.20
|-
| 2013
| align="right" | 10 886 500
| align="right" | | align="right" |
| align="right" | | align="right" |
Line 275: Line 268:
| align="right" | | align="right" |
|- |-
| 2014 | 2012
| align="right" | 10 982 754 | align="right" | 10 777 500
| align="right" | | align="right" |
| align="right" | | align="right" |
Line 286: Line 279:
|} |}
Source: National Institute of Statistics<ref name="INS" /> Source: National Institute of Statistics<ref name="INS" />

=== Structure of the population <ref>http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dyb2.htm</ref> ===

Structure of the population (01.07.2008) (Estimates):
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! width="80pt"|Age Group
! width="80pt"|Male
! width="80pt"|Female
! width="80pt"|Total
! width="80pt"|%
|-
| align="right" | Total
| align="right" | 5 156 300
| align="right" | 5 172 600
| align="right" | 10 328 900
| align="right" | 100
|-
| align="right" | 0-4
| align="right" | 425 600
| align="right" | 406 800
| align="right" | 832 300
| align="right" | 8,06
|-
| align="right" | 5-9
| align="right" | 416 500
| align="right" | 390 400
| align="right" | 806 900
| align="right" | 7,81
|-
| align="right" | 10-14
| align="right" | 444 700
| align="right" | 422 300
| align="right" | 867 000
| align="right" | 8,39
|-
| align="right" | 15-19
| align="right" | 518 800
| align="right" | 493 000
| align="right" | 1 011 800
| align="right" | 9,80
|-
| align="right" | 20-24
| align="right" | 531 600
| align="right" | 522 000
| align="right" | 1 053 600
| align="right" | 10,20
|-
| align="right" | 25-29
| align="right" | 476 500
| align="right" | 487 600
| align="right" | 964 100
| align="right" | 9,33
|-
| align="right" | 30-34
| align="right" | 397 700
| align="right" | 430 800
| align="right" | 828 500
| align="right" | 8,02
|-
| align="right" | 35-39
| align="right" | 343 700
| align="right" | 370 400
| align="right" | 714 000
| align="right" | 6,91
|-
| align="right" | 40-44
| align="right" | 338 400
| align="right" | 363 600
| align="right" | 702 000
| align="right" | 6,80
|-
| align="right" | 45-49
| align="right" | 311 200
| align="right" | 312 000
| align="right" | 623 300
| align="right" | 6,03
|-
| align="right" | 50-54
| align="right" | 265 800
| align="right" | 265 500
| align="right" | 531 300
| align="right" | 5,14
|-
| align="right" | 55-59
| align="right" | 195 000
| align="right" | 200 000
| align="right" | 395 000
| align="right" | 3,82
|-
| align="right" | 60-64
| align="right" | 132 800
| align="right" | 146 100
| align="right" | 278 900
| align="right" | 2,70
|-
| align="right" | 65-69
| align="right" | 116 000
| align="right" | 121 000
| align="right" | 236 900
| align="right" | 2,29
|-
| align="right" | 70-74
| align="right" | 105 000
| align="right" | 109 800
| align="right" | 214 800
| align="right" | 2,08
|-
| align="right" | 75-79
| align="right" | 74 700
| align="right" | 72 700
| align="right" | 147 400
| align="right" | 1,43
|-
| align="right" | 80+
| align="right" | 62 500
| align="right" | 58 600
| align="right" | 121 100
| align="right" | 1,17
|-
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! width="50"|Age group
! width="80pt"|Male
! width="80"|Female
! width="80"|Total
! width="50"|Percent
|-
| align="right" | 0-14
| align="right" | 1 286 800
| align="right" | 1 219 500
| align="right" | 2 506 200
| align="right" | 24,26
|-
| align="right" | 15-64
| align="right" | 3 511 300
| align="right" | 3 591 000
| align="right" | 7 102 500
| align="right" | 68,76
|-
| align="right" | 65+
| align="right" | 358 200
| align="right" | 362 100
| align="right" | 720 200
| align="right" | 6,97
|-
|}


== Genetic == == Genetic ==
While the vast majority of modern ]ns identify themselves as ]s, they are predominantly descended from Berber groups, with some Arab input. Tunisians are also descended, to a lesser extent, from other African, Middle Eastern and European peoples, specifically the ]/], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. In sum, a little less than 20 percent of their genetic material (] analysis) comes from present day ], ] or ].<ref>http://hpgl.stanford.edu/publications/AJHG_2004_v74_p1023-1034.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.cell.com/AJHG/retrieve/pii/S0002929707643651</ref><ref>{{cite journal|pmc=1182266 | pmid=14973781 | doi=10.1086/382286 | volume=74 | issue=3 | title=The Levant versus the Horn of Africa: evidence for bidirectional corridors of human migrations |date=March 2004 | journal=Am. J. Hum. Genet. | pages=532–44 | author=Luis JR, Rowold DJ, Regueiro M|display-authors=etal}}</ref> According to one genetic study while the vast majority of modern ]ns identify themselves as ]s, they are mainly the descendants of Arab-berber groups. Tunisians are also descended, to a lesser extent, from other African, Middle Eastern and European peoples, specifically the ]/], ], ], ] and ] with a little less than 20 percent of their genetic material (] analysis) coming from present day ], ] or ].<ref>http://hpgl.stanford.edu/publications/AJHG_2004_v74_p1023-1034.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.cell.com/AJHG/retrieve/pii/S0002929707643651</ref><ref>{{cite journal|pmc=1182266 | pmid=14973781 | doi=10.1086/382286 | volume=74 | issue=3 | title=The Levant versus the Horn of Africa: evidence for bidirectional corridors of human migrations | year=2004 | month=March | journal=Am. J. Hum. Genet. | pages=532–44 | author=Luis JR, Rowold DJ, Regueiro M, ''et al.''}}</ref>
"In fact, the Tunisian genetic distances to European samples are smaller than those to North African groups. (...) This could be explained by the history of the Tunisian population, reflecting the influence of the ancient Punic settlers of Carthage followed, among others, by Roman, Byzantine, Arab and French occupations, according to historical records. Notwithstanding, other explanations cannot be discarded, such as the relative heterogeneity within current Tunisian populations, and/or the limited sub-Saharan genetic influence in this region as compared with other North African areas, without excluding the possibility of the ], whose effect might be particularly amplified on the X chromosome.",<ref>, Athanasiadis et al. 2007</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Tomas C, Sanchez JJ, Barbaro A |title=X-chromosome SNP analyses in 11 human Mediterranean populations show a high overall genetic homogeneity except in North-west Africans (Moroccans) |journal=BMC Evol. Biol. |volume=8|pages=75 |year=2008 |pmid=18312628 |pmc=2315647 |doi=10.1186/1471-2148-8-75 |url=http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/75 |quote=Tunisians did not show a significant level of differentiation with northern populations as mentioned by others|display-authors=etal}}</ref> This suggests a fairly significant European input to Tunisian genetics compared to other neighbouring populations. "In fact, the Tunisian genetic distances to European samples are smaller than those to North African groups. (...) This could be explained by the history of the Tunisian population, reflecting the influence of the ancient Punic settlers of Carthage followed, among others, by Roman, Byzantine, Arab and French occupations, according to historical records. Notwithstanding, other explanations cannot be discarded, such as the relative heterogeneity within current Tunisian populations, and/or the limited sub-Saharan genetic influence in this region as compared with other North African areas, without excluding the possibility of the ], whose effect might be particularly amplified on the X chromosome.",<ref>, Athanasiadis et al. 2007</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Tomas C, Sanchez JJ, Barbaro A, ''et al'' |title=X-chromosome SNP analyses in 11 human Mediterranean populations show a high overall genetic homogeneity except in North-west Africans (Moroccans) |journal=BMC Evol. Biol. |volume=8|pages=75 |year=2008 |pmid=18312628 |pmc=2315647 |doi=10.1186/1471-2148-8-75 |url=http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/75 |quote=Tunisians did not show a significant level of differentiation with northern populations as mentioned by others}}</ref> This suggests a fairly significant European input to Tunisian genetics compared to other neighbouring populations.

However, later research has suggested instead that Tunisians exhibit a mostly indigenous North African genetic make up similar to other Maghreb populations; characterized by a high amount of native North African genes.<ref>http://www.academia.edu/4137738/Mitochondrial_DNA_and_Y-chromosome_microstructure_in_Tunisia</ref>

===Y-Chromosome===
Listed here are the ] in Tunisia.<ref>Bekada A, Fregel R, Cabrera VM, Larruga JM, Pestano J, et al. (2013) . PLoS ONE 8(2): e56775. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056775</ref>
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center; font-size: 100%"; border="1"
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Haplogroup'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''n'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''B'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''E1a'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''E1b1a'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''E1b1b1'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''E1b1b1a3'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''E1b1b1a4'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''E1b1b1b'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''E1b1b1c'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''F'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''G'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''I'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''J1'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''J2'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''K'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''P,R'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''R1a1'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''R1b1a'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''R1b1b'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''T'''
|-
| Marker||||||M33||M2||M35||V22||V65||M81||M34||M89||M201||||||||||||||V88||M269||M70
|-
| Tunisia||601||0.17||0.5||0.67||1.66||3||3.16||62.73||1.16||2.66||0.17||0.17||16.64||2.83||0.33||0.33||0.5||1.83||0.33||1.16
|-
|}


== CIA World Factbook demographic statistics == == CIA World Factbook demographic statistics ==
Line 514: Line 326:


===Ethnic groups=== ===Ethnic groups===
] 98%, European 1%, Jewish and other 1%<ref name="CIA"/>
* ] : 98%, speak ]
* ] : 2%, speak ], ], ], ] and ]
* ] : 0.01%, speak ]


===Religions=== ===Religions===
(see ]<ref name="report"/>) (see ])
Muslim 98%, Christian 1%, Jewish and other 1%<ref name="CIA"/>
* ] : 99.76%

* ] : 0.23%
===Languages===
* ] : 0.01%
] (] is official); ] (especially in commerce); ], ], ], ] and ]; according to the 1998 ] report, about 26,000 Berbers in ] and ] speak Djerbi


===Literacy=== ===Literacy===
Line 541: Line 352:
{{reflist}} {{reflist}}


{{Demographics of Tunisia}}
{{Africa in topic|Demographics of}} {{Africa in topic|Demographics of}}


Line 547: Line 357:
] ]


]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]

Revision as of 23:04, 26 September 2015

The majority (98% ) of modern Tunisians are Arabized Berber or Arab-Berber, and are speakers of Tunisian Arabic. However, there is also a small (1 percent at most) of pure native Berbers located mainly in the Jabal Dahar mountains in the South East and on the island of Jerba. The Berbers primarily speak Berber languages, often called Shelha, or have shifted to Tunisian Arabic.

Demographics of Tunisia, Data of FAO; Number of inhabitants in thousands.

Nearly all Tunisians (98 percent of the population) are Muslim. There is a Jewish population on the southern island of Djerba and Tunis. There is also a small indigenous Christian population.

Population

Year Population
July 1, 2007 10,225,100
July 1, 2008 10,328,900 +1.02%
July 1, 2009 10,439,600 +1.07%
July 1, 2010 10,547,100 +1.03%
July 1, 2011 10,673,800 +1.20%
July 1, 2012 10,777,500 +0.97%

Source: National Institute of Statistics

Average population Live births Deaths Natural change Crude birth rate (per 1,000) Crude death rate (per 1,000) Natural change (per 1,000) Fertility rates
1990 25.2 5.6 19.6 3.38
1991 24.9 5.6 19.3 3.31
1992 24.9 5.5 19.5 3.27
1993 8 572 200 24.0 5.7 18.3 3.12
1994 8 785 700 22.7 5.7 17.0 2.90
1995 8 957 500 20.8 5.8 15.0 2.67
1996 9 089 300 19.7 5.5 14.2 2.51
1997 9 214 900 18.9 5.6 13.2 2.38
1998 9 333 300 17.9 5.6 12.3 2.23
1999 9 455 900 16.9 5.7 11.2 2.09
2000 9 552 500 17.1 5.6 11.4 2.08
2001 9 650 600 16.9 5.6 11.4 2.05
2002 9 748 900 16.7 5.8 10.8 2.00
2003 9 839 800 17.1 6.1 11.0 2.06
2004 9 932 400 16.8 6.0 10.8 2.02
2005 10 029 000 17.1 5.9 11.2 2.04
2006 10 127 900 17.1 5.6 11.5 2.03
2007 10 225 100 17.4 5.5 11.8 2.04
2008 10 328 900 17.7 5.8 11.9 2.06
2009 10 439 600 17.7 5.7 12.0 2.05
2010 10 547 100 18.6 5.7 12.9 2.13
2011 10 673 800
2012 10 777 500

Source: National Institute of Statistics

Genetic

According to one genetic study while the vast majority of modern Tunisians identify themselves as Arabs, they are mainly the descendants of Arab-berber groups. Tunisians are also descended, to a lesser extent, from other African, Middle Eastern and European peoples, specifically the Phoenicians/Punics, Romans, Vandals, French and Blacks with a little less than 20 percent of their genetic material (Y-chromosome analysis) coming from present day Arabian Peninsula, Europe or Sub-Saharan Africa. "In fact, the Tunisian genetic distances to European samples are smaller than those to North African groups. (...) This could be explained by the history of the Tunisian population, reflecting the influence of the ancient Punic settlers of Carthage followed, among others, by Roman, Byzantine, Arab and French occupations, according to historical records. Notwithstanding, other explanations cannot be discarded, such as the relative heterogeneity within current Tunisian populations, and/or the limited sub-Saharan genetic influence in this region as compared with other North African areas, without excluding the possibility of the genetic drift, whose effect might be particularly amplified on the X chromosome.", This suggests a fairly significant European input to Tunisian genetics compared to other neighbouring populations.

CIA World Factbook demographic statistics

The following demographic statistics are from the CIA World Factbook, unless otherwise indicated.

Nationality

noun:Tunisian(s)
adjective:Tunisian

Vital Statistics

Age structure

0–14 years: 22.2% (male 1,213,664/female 1,137,084)
15–64 years: 70.5% (male 3,759,955/female 3,704,677)
65 years and over: 7.3% (male 358,447/female 415,198) (2010 est.)
0-14 years: 23.2% (male 1,274,348/female 1,193,131)
15-64 years: 69.3% (male 3,638,014/female 3,728,294)
65 years and over: 7.5% (male 390,055/female 405,344) (2011 est.)

Net migration rate

-0.41 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2010 est.)
-1.78 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2012 est.)

Urbaniziation

urban population: 67% of total population (2010)
rate of urbanization: 1.5% annual rate of change (2010-15 est.)

Sex ratio

at birth: 1.07 male(s)/female
under 15 years: 1.07 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 0.97 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.96 male(s)/female
total population: 0.99 male(s)/female (2012 est.)

Infant mortality rate

22.5 deaths/1,000 live births (2010 est.)

Life expectancy at birth

total population: 75.24 years
male: 73.2 years
female: 77.42 years (2012 est.)

Ethnic groups

Arab-Berber 98%, European 1%, Jewish and other 1%

Religions

(see Religion in Tunisia) Muslim 98%, Christian 1%, Jewish and other 1%

Languages

Tunisian Arabic (Modern Standard Arabic is official); French (especially in commerce); Shelha, Ghadamès, Nafusi, Sened and Djerbi; according to the 1998 Ethnologue report, about 26,000 Berbers in Djerba and Matmata speak Djerbi

Literacy

definition: age 15 and over can read and write
total population: 74.3%
male: 83.4%
female: 65.3% (2004 est.)

The literacy rate among the Tunisian population increased greatly after its independence from France. According to the 1996 census data, the literacy rate of the last generation of Tunisian men educated under the French rule (those born 1945-49) was less than 65%. For the first generation educated after independence (born 1950-1954), literacy in Arabic among males had increased to nearly 80%. (Sixty-two percent were also literate in French and 15 percent literate in English). Among the youngest generation included in the census (those born 1980-1984), 96.6% were literate in Arabic.

Among Tunisian women, the increase in literacy was even greater. The literacy rate among the last generation of women educated under the French was less than 30%. In the first generation educated after independence, this increased to just over 40%. For the youngest generation of women cited (born 1980-1984), literacy in Arabic had increased to slightly over 90%; over 70% of women were also literate in French.

References

  1. ^ CIA
  2. Ethnologue entry for Tunisia
  3. ^ "CIA – The World Factbook — Tunisia". Retrieved 2007-01-13.
  4. http://france-echos.com/actualite.php?cle=6174
  5. ^ National Institute of Statistics - Tunisia
  6. http://hpgl.stanford.edu/publications/AJHG_2004_v74_p1023-1034.pdf
  7. http://www.cell.com/AJHG/retrieve/pii/S0002929707643651
  8. Luis JR, Rowold DJ, Regueiro M; et al. (2004). "The Levant versus the Horn of Africa: evidence for bidirectional corridors of human migrations". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74 (3): 532–44. doi:10.1086/382286. PMC 1182266. PMID 14973781. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. The X chromosome Alu insertions as a tool for human population genetics: data from European and African human groups, Athanasiadis et al. 2007
  10. Tomas C, Sanchez JJ, Barbaro A; et al. (2008). "X-chromosome SNP analyses in 11 human Mediterranean populations show a high overall genetic homogeneity except in North-west Africans (Moroccans)". BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 75. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-75. PMC 2315647. PMID 18312628. Tunisians did not show a significant level of differentiation with northern populations as mentioned by others {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  11. As , Walters Keith (2003). "Fergie's prescience: the changing nature of diglossia in Tunisia". International Journal of the Society of Language. 163: 85–87.
  12. The children born in the early 1980s had not yet begun English instruction by the time of the 1996 census, so no literacy rate in English is given. However, the children born between 1970-74 (who had completed their education) had a literacy in English of 20%. It's highly likely that the younger generation's literacy in English was even higher at the conclusion of their schooling. Walters 86.
Demographics of Africa
Sovereign states
States with limited
recognition
Dependencies and
other territories
Category: