Misplaced Pages

User talk:Golbez: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:53, 16 October 2015 editGolbez (talk | contribs)Administrators66,952 edits removing you from where you aren't wanted.← Previous edit Revision as of 06:57, 18 October 2015 edit undoCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,478 edits →Your comments: new sectionNext edit →
Line 79: Line 79:
</div></div> </div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=684928121 --> <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=684928121 -->

== Your comments ==

Hi Golbez, your comments at ] regarding N0n3up are incivil and disruptive and honestly I'm shocked that an admin would enter a talk page discussion in order to disrupt it. I see that you have an axe to grind with N0n3up but this is the sort of behaviour one expects from a brand new editor who doesn't understand how collaborative editing works. If you don't like them, then just avoid them continuing to harass them by disrupting discussions isn't going to achieve anything constructive. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 06:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:57, 18 October 2015


FROM GROßE KAISER: In response to your message, much of the Confederate page seems to be written from a very northern bias point of view. I disagree with much of the page and its obvious others do to. You say you will block me for "engaging in a slow-motion edit war" but it takes more thank one person to have a war therefore if you block me you must also block yourself and everyone else who supposedly participated in the war. I understand what your saying but it isn't your page either. You shouldn't block anyone because they disagree with you. I am simply wanting this page to have no pro northern or pro southern leanings. People's views on the American Civil War should be left out of this article. It should be for informative purposes only. Thank you --Große Kaiser. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Große Kaiser (talk • contribs) 22:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

---Reason to use "United Statian"---

As a Brazilian, I'm just as American as people from the USA and the other citizens of our continent. More specifically, I'm a Latin American, and further a South American.

If e.g. we wanted to talk about Irish people but refered to them generically as European we would be at once imprecise and unfair to the other Europeans. If that's still hard to relate to, imagine a whole continent going through a revolution and changing it's name to "United Countries of the Earth" and refering to themselves as "Earthlings" and to the rest of us, the people from the other continents, as European, Asian, American, African, etc. That's kinda like how we non-US Americans feel when that type of language is used.

America is a continent, not a country. To reduce a whole continent to just one country is a racist practice from our languages that should be dropped. In Spanish (estadounidense or estadunidense), Portuguese (estadunidense), French and many more languages we have terms for American and United Statian. Which are used in every-day speech.

Also I have read this term several times in many places and the first one was Misplaced Pages. That's why I think it is worth mentioning in an article. The purpouse of an encyclopedia is to spread culture and make this a smarter world.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dembowow (talk • contribs) 07:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm telling you I haven't invented it, I read it on Misplaced Pages for first time. And then I googled it and found it on many more places, like Wictionary. It's worth mentioning. Are you blind, racist or what??

Dembowow (talk) 13:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

2012


Kingroyos (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

About Ikaruga revert

About the revert of bullet hell, just for clarification the term best is written in http://en.wikipedia.org/Shoot_%27em_up in paragraph Bullet hell and niche appeal

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

Your comments

Hi Golbez, your comments at Talk:United States#Redundant regarding N0n3up are incivil and disruptive and honestly I'm shocked that an admin would enter a talk page discussion in order to disrupt it. I see that you have an axe to grind with N0n3up but this is the sort of behaviour one expects from a brand new editor who doesn't understand how collaborative editing works. If you don't like them, then just avoid them continuing to harass them by disrupting discussions isn't going to achieve anything constructive. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)