Revision as of 07:15, 19 February 2003 view sourceMav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users77,874 editsm February 18; put image in table← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:43, 21 February 2003 view source Alan Peakall (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,031 edits Improved historical background to the Pluto debateNext edit → | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
== The Pluto debate == | == The Pluto debate == | ||
The planet Pluto was originally discovered in ] |
The planet Pluto was originally discovered in ] in the course of a search for a body sufficiently massive to account for supposed anomalies in the orbits of ] and Neptune. Once it was found, its faintness and failure to show a visible disc cast doubt on the idea that it could be ] Planet X. | ||
In the following decades estimates of Pluto's mass and diameter were the subject of debate as telescopes and imaging systems improved. The consensus steadily favoured smaller masses and diameters as time passed. Indeed, one observer waggishly pointed out that if the trend were extrapolated the planet seemed to be in danger of vanishing altogether. | |||
Since that time, telescopes and imaging systems have improved considerably. Pluto's moon ] has been discovered and this enabled us to figure out Pluto's mass, showing it to be smaller than even ]. It was also found that Pluto is made largely of ice. | |||
In an attempt to reconcile Pluto's small apparent size with its identification as Planet X, the theory of specular reflection was proposed. This held that observers were measuring only the diameter of a bright spot on the highly reflective surface of a much larger planet which could thereby be massive without having an exceptionally high density. | |||
The uncertainty was conclusively resolved by the discovery of Pluto's satellite Charon in ]. This made it possible to determine the combined mass of the Pluto-Charon system which turned out to be lower even than that anticipated by skeptics of the specular reflection theory, which was then rendered completely untenable. The accepted figure for Pluto's diameter today makes it comparable in size with the ] and less massive on account of its being largely composed of ice.. | |||
At the time of Pluto's discovery it was the farthest object known in the solar system and we can now recognised that its discover was as much due to luck as to the diligence of Tombough's search. While Pluto's identification as Planet X was then doubted, it was nevertheless identified as the solar system's ninth planet. | |||
In September of 1992 scientists began discovering hundreds of other, smaller, icy bodies in the area of the solar system beyond the orbit of Neptune. These objects are now deemed members of the Edgeworth-]. The continued discovery of these objects began a debate that goes on to this day: is Pluto a planet or simply the largest (known) example of an Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt object? | In September of 1992 scientists began discovering hundreds of other, smaller, icy bodies in the area of the solar system beyond the orbit of Neptune. These objects are now deemed members of the Edgeworth-]. The continued discovery of these objects began a debate that goes on to this day: is Pluto a planet or simply the largest (known) example of an Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt object? |
Revision as of 12:43, 21 February 2003
File:Pluto.gif |
|||||||
Discovery | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discovered by | Clyde Tombaugh | ||||||
Discovered in | 1930 | ||||||
Orbital characteristics | |||||||
Mean radius | 5.91352×10 km | ||||||
Eccentricity | 0.2482 | ||||||
Revolution period | 248y 197d 5.5h | ||||||
Inclination | 17.148° | ||||||
Number of satellites | 1 | ||||||
Physical characteristics | |||||||
Equatorial diameter | 2320 km | ||||||
Surface area | 17 million km | ||||||
Mass | 1.290×10 kg | ||||||
Mean density | 2.05 g/cm | ||||||
Surface gravity | 0.4 m/s | ||||||
Rotation period | 6d 9h 17.6m | ||||||
Axial tilt | 122.52° | ||||||
Albedo | 0.30 | ||||||
Surface temp. |
|
||||||
Atmospheric characteristics | |||||||
Atmospheric pressure | 0 - 0.01 kPa | ||||||
Nitrogen | 90% | ||||||
Methane | 10% |
Pluto is the ninth and smallest planet of our solar system. It was discovered by the astronomer Clyde Tombaugh at the Lowell Observatory in Arizona on February 18, 1930. Tombaugh was searching for a "Planet X" to explain the orbit of Neptune; further analysis, with seven decades more data about Neptune's position, has resolved the perceived anomaly without need for an additional gravitational pull on Neptune. Its highly eccentric orbit makes Pluto the eighth-most distant planet from the Sun for part of each orbit; this most recently occurred from February 7, 1979 through February 11, 1999. Pluto orbits in a 3/2 resonance with Neptune. Because of its small size and eccentric orbit, there has been some debate over whether it truly should be classified as a planet. There is mounting evidence that Pluto may in fact be a member of the Kuiper Belt, only one of a large number of distant icy bodies. A subclass of such objects have been dubbed plutinos, after Pluto.
Pluto has an atmosphere when it is close to perihelion; the atmosphere freezes out as Pluto moves further from the Sun.
Pluto has one natural satellite, Charon. Little is known about Pluto because of its great distance from Earth and because no exploratory spacecraft have visited Pluto yet.
Some researchers have suggested that Pluto and its moon Charon were moons of Neptune that were knocked out of Neptune's orbit. It is now thought that not only was Pluto never Neptune's moon, but that Triton was originally an independent body much like Pluto which was captured by Neptune.
The Pluto debate
The planet Pluto was originally discovered in 1930 in the course of a search for a body sufficiently massive to account for supposed anomalies in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. Once it was found, its faintness and failure to show a visible disc cast doubt on the idea that it could be Lowell's Planet X.
In the following decades estimates of Pluto's mass and diameter were the subject of debate as telescopes and imaging systems improved. The consensus steadily favoured smaller masses and diameters as time passed. Indeed, one observer waggishly pointed out that if the trend were extrapolated the planet seemed to be in danger of vanishing altogether.
In an attempt to reconcile Pluto's small apparent size with its identification as Planet X, the theory of specular reflection was proposed. This held that observers were measuring only the diameter of a bright spot on the highly reflective surface of a much larger planet which could thereby be massive without having an exceptionally high density.
The uncertainty was conclusively resolved by the discovery of Pluto's satellite Charon in 1978. This made it possible to determine the combined mass of the Pluto-Charon system which turned out to be lower even than that anticipated by skeptics of the specular reflection theory, which was then rendered completely untenable. The accepted figure for Pluto's diameter today makes it comparable in size with the Moon and less massive on account of its being largely composed of ice..
At the time of Pluto's discovery it was the farthest object known in the solar system and we can now recognised that its discover was as much due to luck as to the diligence of Tombough's search. While Pluto's identification as Planet X was then doubted, it was nevertheless identified as the solar system's ninth planet.
In September of 1992 scientists began discovering hundreds of other, smaller, icy bodies in the area of the solar system beyond the orbit of Neptune. These objects are now deemed members of the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt. The continued discovery of these objects began a debate that goes on to this day: is Pluto a planet or simply the largest (known) example of an Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt object?
This planetary sciences debate landed in newspaper headlines, editorials, and on the internet in early 1999. Thoughts that Pluto might be "demoted" as a planet left certain sectors of the public angry. Such news outlets as the BBC News Online, the Boston Globe and USA Today all printed stories noting that the International Astronomical Union was considering dropping Pluto's planetary status. "Save Pluto" websites sprang up, and school children sent letters to astronomers and the IAU.
On February 3, 1999 Brian Marsden of the Minor Planets Center inadvertently fueled the debate when he issued an editorial in the Minor Planets Electronic Circular 1999-C03 noting that the 10,000th minor planet was about to be numbered and this called for a large celebration (the IAU celebrates every thousandths numbered minor planet in some way). He suggested that Pluto be honored with the number 10,000, giving it "dual citizenship" of sorts as both a major and a minor planet.
Between the media reports and the Minor Planets Electronic Circular, IAU General Secretary Joannes Anderson issued a press release that same day stating there were no plans to change Pluto's planetary status.
The debate continues, and recent discoveries have made the position of Pluto as a major planet perhaps even harder to sustain. On October 7, 2002 Mike Brown and Chad Trajillo announced at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society their discovery of Quaoar. This new object in the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt is 1280 km in diameter, making it a bit more than half the size of Pluto. Quaoar is the largest object discovered in the solar system since Pluto itself in 1930. Some astronomers think it is only a matter of time before a Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt object larger than Pluto is discovered.
Exploration of Pluto
NASA has approved a mission to Pluto, to be conducted by The Southwest Research Institute. (Referred to as "Pluto Express")
The planet is named both for the Roman god Pluto, and for the astronomer Percival Lowell, who predicted that a planet would be found beyond Neptune.
Solar system:
Sun - Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Asteroids - Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto - Comets