| Revision as of 17:03, 10 August 2006 editTwinsMetsFan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users122,110 edits →Principle 1: let's get this started, shall we?← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:29, 10 August 2006 edit undoSFGiants (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,309 edits →Principle 1: (State name) (Road type) X: agreedNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| ====Discussion==== | ====Discussion==== | ||
| As far as I know, this convention is what most people, including me, have wanted. ]]] ] ] 17:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Principle 2=== | ===Principle 2=== | ||
Revision as of 17:29, 10 August 2006
Part 1
Here, we are voting on principle. That is the generic pattern for all the states.
Here is how it works: Arguments go under the Principle header. Discussion/rebuttals go under the Discussion header.
Voting takes place later, arguments only for now.
Example:
Principle 0: blah blah blah xx
The blah blah blah convention is good. It is correct because the DOT uses it. It follows all Misplaced Pages conventions. --User:boring
I think so because here is more proof: --User:boring2
Discussion
I would disagree because it is wrong. --interestingt
Discussion starts below:
Principle 1: (State name) (Road type) X
This format is already used by a number of WikiProjects, including (but not limited to) New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont and Maryland. The reason that "New York State" is used for the state name in NY is to disambiguate between New York State and New York City. --TMF 17:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
As far as I know, this convention is what most people, including me, have wanted. ςפקιДИτς ☺ ☻ 17:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)