| Revision as of 02:59, 6 November 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,785 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:DHeyward/Archive 19) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:28, 7 November 2015 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,934 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
| Please stop edit warring at ]. As the one introducing challenged material, the ] is on you to defend it on the talk page.--] ]/] 04:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC) | Please stop edit warring at ]. As the one introducing challenged material, the ] is on you to defend it on the talk page.--] ]/] 04:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == November 2015 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] decision and for your arbitration enforcement restriction, which prohibits you "from all edits and discussion regarding ]", you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] (specifically ]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the ] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. ] | ] 15:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC) <hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following ] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
Revision as of 15:28, 7 November 2015
- /Archive 1 Created May 1. 2006
- /Archive 2 Created August 24, 2006
- /Archive 3 Created September 30, 2006
- /Archive 4 Created November 19, 2006
- /Archive 5 Created 05:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 6 Created 15:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 7 Created 04:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 08 Created 01:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 09 Created 05:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 10 Created --DHeyward (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- /Archive 11 created --DHeyward (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- /Archive 12 created --DHeyward (talk) 09:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- /Archive 13
- /Archive 14
- /Archive 15
- /Archive 16
- /Archive 17
Wednesday 15 January11:42 UTC
Please add comments to the bottom
UTRS Account Request
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. DHeyward (talk)
Revisiting MOS:IDENTITY on transgender individuals in articles about themselves and in passing in other articles
You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Misplaced Pages's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.
Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 01:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
For your great input at UCC shooting/talk. ...Checkingfax ( Talk ) 02:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC) |
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
−
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Samsara 19:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry about the beer getting deleted - that was not intentional. Samsara 19:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Gone
I'm leaving the Clock Boy incident article. In short, I'm doing so because I'm sick of contributing good edits that just get reverted or obliterated; I'm sick of the snide edit summaries left after those competing edits are made. I'm sick of the article ownership. I left my final word there at the talk page here. You, I've enjoyed editing with. The other regulars, not at all. See you elsewhere, I'm sure. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 04:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Policy on living persons at Talk:Cecil (lion)
I've posted about an issue here in which you are involved. Samsara 15:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Vested contributors arbitration case opened
You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 01:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration evidence
Hi DHeyward,
Your section on the evidence page has been moved to the evidence talk page as it does not meet the requirements for inclusion as evidence. This has been undertaken as a clerk action and should not be reverted.
For the Arbitration Comittee. Amortias (T)(C) 12:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring at Depression Quest
Please stop edit warring at Depression Quest. As the one introducing challenged material, the burden of evidence is on you to defend it on the talk page.--Cúchullain /c 04:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."