Revision as of 22:53, 6 January 2016 editJavaddeniro (talk | contribs)27 edits →The Seljuks: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:12, 6 January 2016 edit undoParamandyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,090 edits →The SeljuksNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Dear Kansas , I think you have made a mistake in your interpration about the meaning of ethnicity.If you read wikipedia about ethnicity you would see an ethnicity is defined based on the anccestors , language and culture of a group of people.as you do agree with e the later generations of the house of Seljuk was highly Persinated by culture and language , so I can not understand why do you against the Persian part of the house of Seljuk | Dear Kansas , I think you have made a mistake in your interpration about the meaning of ethnicity.If you read wikipedia about ethnicity you would see an ethnicity is defined based on the anccestors , language and culture of a group of people.as you do agree with e the later generations of the house of Seljuk was highly Persinated by culture and language , so I can not understand why do you against the Persian part of the house of Seljuk | ||
:This is '''not''' <u>my</u> interpretation. This is <u>blatantly</u> stated by the academic sources I have provided. | |||
*According to Canfield, ''Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective'', page 12, "''''" --] (]) 23:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:12, 6 January 2016
Archives |
JSTOR | This user has access to JSTOR through The Misplaced Pages Library |
Reply
Hello, Paramandyr. You have new messages at 1bandsaw's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Seljuks
Dear Kansas , I think you have made a mistake in your interpration about the meaning of ethnicity.If you read wikipedia about ethnicity you would see an ethnicity is defined based on the anccestors , language and culture of a group of people.as you do agree with e the later generations of the house of Seljuk was highly Persinated by culture and language , so I can not understand why do you against the Persian part of the house of Seljuk
- This is not my interpretation. This is blatantly stated by the academic sources I have provided.
- According to Canfield, Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective, page 12, "This composite culture was the beginning of the Turko-Persian variant of Islamicate culture. It was Persianate in that it was centered on the lettered tradition of Iranian origin; it was Turkish in so far as it was for many generations patronized by rulers of Turkic ancestry..." --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)