Revision as of 19:52, 20 January 2016 editDarkfrog24 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users16,820 edits →I'd like some input← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 20 January 2016 edit undoDarkfrog24 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users16,820 editsm →I'd like some inputNext edit → | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
== I'd like some input == | == I'd like some input == | ||
I've been asking around, but I'd like your take. In your view what, other than a ban, would be a good outcome here? | I've been asking around, but I'd like your take. In your view, what, other than a ban, would be a good outcome here? | ||
As for my interest, I'm a professional proofreader and editor. I've focused on pages that concern my area of expertise. ] (]) 19:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | As for my interest, I'm a professional proofreader and editor. I've focused on pages that concern my area of expertise. ] (]) 19:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:53, 20 January 2016
You may want to increment {{Archive basics}} to |counter= 6
as User talk:Laser brain/Archive 5 is larger than the recommended 150Kb.
Archives |
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Iwane Matsui GAN
Iwane Matsui, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
It's that season again...
Happy Saturnalia | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Warmest Wishes for Health, Wealth and Wisdom through the Holidays and the Coming Year! Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 00:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
I'd like some input
I've been asking around, but I'd like your take. In your view, what, other than a ban, would be a good outcome here? As for my interest, I'm a professional proofreader and editor. I've focused on pages that concern my area of expertise. Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)