Revision as of 01:59, 22 January 2016 editMostlyoksorta (talk | contribs)298 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:38, 22 January 2016 edit undoMercy11 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,098 edits rNext edit → |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
Seems like someone went ahead and added some negative unsourced stuff to this page. While sourced criticism is allowed, random comments with vague petitions are not. ] (]) 23:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
Seems like someone went ahead and added some negative unsourced stuff to this page. While sourced criticism is allowed, random comments with vague petitions are not. ] (]) 23:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Including a better business rating in an article about a corporation is relevant and meets Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion. If you feel otherwise do not blank sections, please let me know why. (] (]) 01:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)) ] (]) 01:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
:Including a better business rating in an article about a corporation is relevant and meets Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion. If you feel otherwise do not blank sections, please let me know why. (] (]) 01:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)) ] (]) 01:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::1) ]: unsourced negative statements; 2) ] : Underhanded attempt to publicly deplore a business; 3) ]: This article should be about the <u>company</u> not about <u>complaints</u> about the company. FYI, your plead that your sections not be blanked out, is not how we work at Misplaced Pages; you need to develop your sections with RSs for them to stay. ] (]) 23:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
Seems like someone went ahead and added some negative unsourced stuff to this page. While sourced criticism is allowed, random comments with vague petitions are not. Mk17b (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)