Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:36, 23 January 2016

Companies Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Misplaced Pages:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

Virginia Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 August 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Complaints and NPOV

Seems like someone went ahead and added some negative unsourced stuff to this page. While sourced criticism is allowed, random comments with vague petitions are not. Mk17b (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Including a better business rating in an article about a corporation is relevant and meets Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion. If you feel otherwise do not blank sections, please let me know why. (Mostlyoksorta (talk) 01:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)) Mostlyoksorta (talk) 01:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

1) WP:OR: unsourced negative statements; 2) WP:NPOV : Underhanded attempt to publicly deplore a business; 3) WP:WEIGHT: This article should be about the company not about complaints about the company. FYI, your plead that your sections not be blanked out, is not how we work at Misplaced Pages; you need to develop your sections with RSs for them to stay. Mercy11 (talk) 23:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Actually, complaints about a company are legitimate as can be seen throughout Misplaced Pages. So long as they are sourced. The Better Business Bureau is clearly a source that is neutral and meets Misplaced Pages's standards. Also, a description of the company shouldn't just include company news releases and favorable information. It should include ALL information that meets Misplaced Pages sourcing guidelines, which the BBB grade clearly does. Much like Academy Award nominations are included in actors wiki articles, since they are an independent evaluation, so too can independent BBB ratings be included. (Mostlyoksorta (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)) Mostlyoksorta (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Also, friendly English tip, your use of 'deplore' is incorrect. I think you mean disparage. 😊 Just trying to help out. Mostlyoksorta (talk) 00:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

• Stub-Class company articles
• Unknown-importance company articles
• WikiProject Companies articles
• Stub-Class Virginia articles
• Low-importance Virginia articles
• WikiProject Virginia articles