| Revision as of 01:45, 13 March 2016 edit96.59.84.189 (talk) →You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:45, 13 March 2016 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,930 editsm Signing comment by 96.59.84.189 - "→You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View: "Next edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| You are denying facts by saying "it *may* be a fact that Wade tried to have Colorado admitted as a state" when it is an indisputable *fact* and attempted just three days after the House voted to require a Senate trial. I ask that you please stop censoring facts. Denying facts not only discredits the Misplaced Pages prevents encyclopedia readers from getting valid information. | You are denying facts by saying "it *may* be a fact that Wade tried to have Colorado admitted as a state" when it is an indisputable *fact* and attempted just three days after the House voted to require a Senate trial. I ask that you please stop censoring facts. Denying facts not only discredits the Misplaced Pages prevents encyclopedia readers from getting valid information. | ||
| Additionally, I have not cited *Birth of a Nation* or even mentioned it. I can only conclude that your irrelevant attempt to link me to it is a personal attack. As an experienced editor should know that the Misplaced Pages prohibits personal attacks. Please stop. Furthermore, the linkage attempt is evidence of your lack of a neutral viewpoint for which you have *invited* others to write you about if they feel that you don't adhere to it. | Additionally, I have not cited *Birth of a Nation* or even mentioned it. I can only conclude that your irrelevant attempt to link me to it is a personal attack. As an experienced editor should know that the Misplaced Pages prohibits personal attacks. Please stop. Furthermore, the linkage attempt is evidence of your lack of a neutral viewpoint for which you have *invited* others to write you about if they feel that you don't adhere to it. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| == BDS == | == BDS == | ||
Revision as of 01:45, 13 March 2016
SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages. |
|
| This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
|
Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Islamic Terrorist Attacks
Regarding the attack in Yemen in which 15 Elderly Christians were killed, I do not think it is appropriate to take down the post and say that it is not an Islamic attack. The local authorities stated that there is a high possibility that ISIL is responsible for the attack. Just because you think that information should be censored because it involves attacks that have been committed by Muslims that doesn't mean that you can take them down. You're username is Malcolm X so I am sure that you have a biased opinion regarding Muslims.
JasperHansen111 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl X Saviour (talk • contribs) 08:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- It really doesn't matter what you or I think. What matters is what reliable sources say. According to the source you selected and cited, the motive for the attack is unknown and no group has claimed responsibility for it. If local authorities have identified the perpetrators, please cite a source that says so.
- Also, please read WP:No personal attacks. As the policy says, "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Thank you. — MShabazz /Stalk 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 March 2016
- News and notes: Tretikov resigns, WMF in transition
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Brawling
- Recent research: Misplaced Pages and paid labour; Swedish gender gap; how verifiable is "verifiable"?
You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View
You have improperly removed all citations at the Andrew Johnson Impeachment page for Robert Sylph Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" even though the citations refer to matter of *fact,* not opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.84.189 (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- As I wrote in my edit summary, modern historians generally disregard the "facts" in Henry's 1938 book about Reconstruction because of his glaring white supremacist and neo-Confederate bias. Feel free to believe its "facts" if you'd like, but don't use that book as a reliable source -- because it's not. — MShabazz /Stalk 22:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
One of the facts documented by Robert Selph Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" is that Benjamin Wade attempted to have Colorado admitted as a state in an effort to get two more senators added to the pool of those likely to vote for conviction. You may choose to believe that merely because it is mentioned in Henry's book that it is not a fact, but that does not make you correct. It is an indisputable, historical fact and facts should be in the wikipedia whether you choose to believe them or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.84.189 (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- You're confusing facts and interpretations. It may be a fact that Wade tried to have Colorado admitted as a state. His motivation, though, is a historian's interpretation unless Wade made speeches or left letters/diaries/papers that indicate his motivation. There has been a revolution in the interpretation of Reconstruction over the more than 75 years since Henry wrote his racist tome, and you ignore modern historiography at your own peril. Or maybe you believe The Birth of a Nation is also historically correct. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 00:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
You are denying facts by saying "it *may* be a fact that Wade tried to have Colorado admitted as a state" when it is an indisputable *fact* and attempted just three days after the House voted to require a Senate trial. I ask that you please stop censoring facts. Denying facts not only discredits the Misplaced Pages prevents encyclopedia readers from getting valid information.
Additionally, I have not cited *Birth of a Nation* or even mentioned it. I can only conclude that your irrelevant attempt to link me to it is a personal attack. As an experienced editor should know that the Misplaced Pages prohibits personal attacks. Please stop. Furthermore, the linkage attempt is evidence of your lack of a neutral viewpoint for which you have *invited* others to write you about if they feel that you don't adhere to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.84.189 (talk) 01:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
BDS
You have violated 1RR on the BDS article. Kindly self revert or I will have to report you. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 00:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you for the notice. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 01:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)