Revision as of 12:00, 27 March 2016 editIan.thomson (talk | contribs)58,562 edits →Fixed: I did bring up something, but as with Неполканов at Talk:Karaims, you refused to address things and just tried to change the subject.← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:09, 27 March 2016 edit undoYuHuw (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,225 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:What part of "Why do you ignore the further edits by Неполканов that Midas02 did not revert, alter, or argue with?" did you not understand? Are you ] or ]? | :What part of "Why do you ignore the further edits by Неполканов that Midas02 did not revert, alter, or argue with?" did you not understand? Are you ] or ]? | ||
:I did bring up something, but as with Неполканов at ], you refused to address things and just tried to change the subject. ] (]) 12:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC) | :I did bring up something, but as with Неполканов at ], you refused to address things and just tried to change the subject. ] (]) 12:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
::I have already answered that question above and there is no need to insult my intelligence. If you have nothing of substance to discuss I wish you to leave me alone now Ian. I am finding your aggressive attention unwelcome and somewhat Harassing. All the best. ] (]) 12:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:09, 27 March 2016
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Untitled
Karaite is a way of describing believers in the Abrahamic faiths who do not base their religious practice upon anything but what they consider divine revelation (which varies greatly depending upon which group is being referred to). Karaite is usually used to describes Karaite Jews or even the endangered Kypchak ethnic group of Karaims from theformer Eastern Block who can be regarded as a type of Christian/Muslim. This article should not redirect to an article exclusively about only the Jewish type of Karaite. Kaz 20:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
MOS:DAB
@Midas02: Please explain how the version of 11:16, 12 January 2016 by Dbachmann violates MOS:DAB.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Fixed
The solution for this disambiguation is that Karaims must be listed here and that the Karaims page itself must be a disambiguation page. The only objection to logic has been that some editors tried to pretend a puppet of Kaz was involved here but that concern has been dismissed. The only other "solution" would be to have Karaims redirect here and list all the different meanings of Karaims here too, but since the word Karaites does not refer to all the meanings of Karaims then that would only increase the confusion that has plagued this topic for years apparently. @Dbachmann: there is no objection to restoring the simple solution by @Midas02: am I right? YuHuw (talk) 06:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Would also like to welcome User:Ian.thomson. Would you like to be involved in discussion here? YuHuw (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Per WP:BRD, you need to get consensus before restoring your version. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- And why do you think there is no consensus on the version by User:Midas02?— Preceding unsigned comment added by YuHuw (talk • contribs)
- Why do you ignore the further edits by Неполканов that Midas02 did not revert, alter, or argue with? Ian.thomson (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- I have no evidence that those edits have been seen by all involved in building this consensus yet. Let's just wait for all the editors to chip in before any more reverts is that a fair suggestion? YuHuw (talk) 11:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- I am sad to see you ignored my polite request I have already apologized three times , , , for hurting your religious sensibilities. No offense was intended. Revenge is not the answer. Better if you could discuss logically and rationally. YuHuw (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Why do you ignore the further edits by Неполканов that Midas02 did not revert, alter, or argue with? Ian.thomson (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- And why do you think there is no consensus on the version by User:Midas02?— Preceding unsigned comment added by YuHuw (talk • contribs)
- Once again, that you keep bringing up "offending my religious sensibilities" when I've made it pretty clear that's not the issue is a sign that you are not assuming good faith. Given how you regularly misdirect in conversations, it's getting hard for me to not wonder if you're using that to try to throw me off. It doesn't matter if you were complaining about missionaries, communists, freemasons, or lizard people, your rant about them was paranoid, your "evidence" was mostly bad-faith accusations, and altogether it is a sign that you probably need to stay away from this topic.
- No objection has been provided for Неполканов's further edits, beyond you being butthurt over the sockpuppet investigation. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Ian.thomson, I am very sorry I can't see anything of substance to respond to (source discussion, factual basis etc.) so unless you change your current tactic I am going to drop the discussion with you here. All the best. YuHuw (talk) 11:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- What part of "Why do you ignore the further edits by Неполканов that Midas02 did not revert, alter, or argue with?" did you not understand? Are you doing this intentionally or are you just incapable of answering a question?
- I did bring up something, but as with Неполканов at Talk:Karaims, you refused to address things and just tried to change the subject. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- I have already answered that question above and there is no need to insult my intelligence. If you have nothing of substance to discuss I wish you to leave me alone now Ian. I am finding your aggressive attention unwelcome and somewhat Harassing. All the best. YuHuw (talk) 12:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)