Revision as of 08:12, 12 April 2016 editRandykitty (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators122,495 edits You have been blocked from editing for disruptive editing. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:40, 12 April 2016 edit undoLight2021 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,471 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== April 2016 == | == April 2016 == | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistent ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] (]) 08:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistent ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] (]) 08:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> | ||
{{unblock | reason=your reason here Light21 08:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)}} There are only 2 active users for editing and reviewing process. They are misusing wikipedia norms and regulations to influence the process. They have blocked the account with peronal attack and vendetta to prove nothing significant but a grudge against an editir. There are no significant entries from user ] ] or reasons are presented. They are only writing against the norms of Misplaced Pages. and disruptive the process by making false accusations or blocking the editors. These two editors are making personal attacks and nothing significant. The fact and review process has been done for the article written, and even verified by credidibility of sources. The users ] ] are failed to provide any proof or information against their comments except building a false guidelines and set of standards. |
Revision as of 08:40, 12 April 2016
Welcome!
Hello, Light2021, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Deletion discussion about Exioms
Hello, Exioms2050,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Exioms should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Exioms .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, JamesG5 (talk) 07:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Only warning
Please note that edits like this one can be construed as an attempt to deceive. Continue on this road and you'll find yourself blocked from editing. --Randykitty (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Randykitty (talk) 08:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Light2021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
your reason here Light21 08:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here Light21 08:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here Light21 08:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here Light21 08:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
There are only 2 active users for editing and reviewing process. They are misusing wikipedia norms and regulations to influence the process. They have blocked the account with peronal attack and vendetta to prove nothing significant but a grudge against an editir. There are no significant entries from user Randykitty Xxanthippe or reasons are presented. They are only writing against the norms of Misplaced Pages. and disruptive the process by making false accusations or blocking the editors. These two editors are making personal attacks and nothing significant. The fact and review process has been done for the article written, and even verified by credidibility of sources. The users Randykitty Xxanthippe are failed to provide any proof or information against their comments except building a false guidelines and set of standards.
Category: