Revision as of 12:23, 16 April 2016 edit50.29.199.144 (talk) →January 2016: Inner Focus← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:37, 16 April 2016 edit undoCyphoidbomb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users166,474 edits →January 2016: RNext edit → | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
*I've increased your block to three months for block evasion. I've also revoked your access to this page.--] (]) 15:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC) | *I've increased your block to three months for block evasion. I've also revoked your access to this page.--] (]) 15:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
**No worries now. I've been reinstated now. I'm only focused on the articles, not any user pages or off-topic pages anymore. ] (]) 12:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC) | **No worries now. I've been reinstated now. I'm only focused on the articles, not any user pages or off-topic pages anymore. ] (]) 12:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::Virtually none of your recent changes are sourced. Please be sure to add references ASAP, because if you submit more unsourced content, you will be blocked again for disruptive editing. You also need to double-check your submissions for grammar and spelling errors like and . I also can't help but notice that the reference you added has a title that is not consistent with the article's title, and the content "15 games with 25 tackles and 2.5 sacks" is not supported by article prose. ] (]) 19:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:37, 16 April 2016
December 2015
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hadouken! has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hadouken! was changed by 50.29.199.144 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960089 on 2015-12-14T15:45:40+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at The Karate Kid (2010 film). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Karate Kid (2010 film) was changed by 50.29.199.144 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940533 on 2015-12-14T18:46:30+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- I personally don't think it's any vandalism at all. It's just giving a private message that the plot summary should be where it requires. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 18:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Thanks for your edits to the DragonForce article.
Hello, 50.29.199.144, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
January 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jalen Ramsey, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ 20:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's OK now. A reference has been added for the article. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 20:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Block
I've blocked you for 31 hours for disruptive editing. See WP:GAB for how to appeal this block.
Regardless of your motives, I have just spent some time cleaning up after you. I've deleted talk pages and rolled back your edits to talk and user pages. You are not an administrator. You cannot issue block notices or even quasi block notices to other user. You also should not be tagging users as socks or confirmed socks or whatever. If you promise to stop doing anything like this again, I will unblock you.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.50.29.199.144 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Forgive me Bbb23. It was my fault. I should not even pose as an administrator or mini-op any sort of user on the site. I promise deep in my heart, that I would never want to do this ever again. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Fine. I'll take you at your word, but any repeat of this behavior will result in a much longer block. I've unblocked you. Bbb23 (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Emmanuel Ogbah. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~ 23:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- What are you? Human or bot? You got quite some security sightreading I must assume. The source has already been added to the article so it's fine now. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
January 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Calvin Pryor. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --allthefoxes 01:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
"announced to enter"
For example: "After his junior season, Phillips announced to enter the 2015 NFL Draft." grammatically doesn't make sense. Can you please not continue this?--Yankees10 01:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
January 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Calvin Pryor. If you are to write ANY information on Misplaced Pages, it must be sourced, especially for living people. Please cite where your information was received from! --allthefoxes 01:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- Aye karumba! Give me a fucking break already! What are you? Human or robot? Some say edits without sourcing material are OK but can't you let them be credible for JUST once? Uh mean, whatever! You're just playing shenanigans already! 50.29.199.144 (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- I am a human, maybe. Some call me a robot. Either way, the main issue is that your statistics are not sourced. Anything you add to a biography of a living person should be sourced. Where are you getting these statistics from?
- Maybe if you check this website out, you might get the stats from the players. And there's your answer there. Hope it helps. :-D -- 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Great! Now, you need to cite that in the article! --allthefoxes 02:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Bingo! Successfully cited. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! --allthefoxes 02:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Bingo! Successfully cited. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Great! Now, you need to cite that in the article! --allthefoxes 02:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe if you check this website out, you might get the stats from the players. And there's your answer there. Hope it helps. :-D -- 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- I am a human, maybe. Some call me a robot. Either way, the main issue is that your statistics are not sourced. Anything you add to a biography of a living person should be sourced. Where are you getting these statistics from?
- Aye karumba! Give me a fucking break already! What are you? Human or robot? Some say edits without sourcing material are OK but can't you let them be credible for JUST once? Uh mean, whatever! You're just playing shenanigans already! 50.29.199.144 (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
50.29.199.144 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Forgive me again Bbb123. I'm on the wrong road once again. I shouldn't have done it again, but I actually have. I'll admit this for once. I've been touring so many list of sock puppet and banned user pages trying to put up the proper notices, but only admins or other users with specific rights can do that. I guess I wasn't up to the task after all. I should've only focused on the real articles, but now that I know that no one can really edit userpages, I think I'll stop doing the wrong thing like this for good. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 14:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Did not learn from the last block apparently. OhNoitsJamie 18:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I've increased your block to three months for block evasion. I've also revoked your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- No worries now. I've been reinstated now. I'm only focused on the articles, not any user pages or off-topic pages anymore. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Virtually none of your recent changes are sourced. Please be sure to add references ASAP, because if you submit more unsourced content, you will be blocked again for disruptive editing. You also need to double-check your submissions for grammar and spelling errors like here and here. I also can't help but notice that the reference you added here has a title that is not consistent with the article's title, and the content "15 games with 25 tackles and 2.5 sacks" is not supported by article prose. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)