| Revision as of 00:15, 18 April 2016 editAntisoapbox (talk | contribs)134 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:20, 18 April 2016 edit undoZad68 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,355 edits →Deleting research that you don't agree with: rNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| == Deleting research that you don't agree with == | == Deleting research that you don't agree with == | ||
| If you don't like my citations to and quotations of research articles, then post your own research that furthers your POV since that seems to be your game. My edits added research on both sides of the issue. Your further improper reverts will be challenged. Post research -- don't censor research that you don't like. ] (]) 00:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC) | If you don't like my citations to and quotations of research articles, then post your own research that furthers your POV since that seems to be your game. My edits added research on both sides of the issue. Your further improper reverts will be challenged. Post research -- don't censor research that you don't like. ] (]) 00:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :{{u|Antisoapbox}} sorry that you feel that way. On Misplaced Pages there are many content policies that cover things such as high-quality sourcing, verifiability and due weight, that direct what's appropriate for articles and what isn't. I see that others have disagreed with your changes as well, those are best handled at the individual article Talk pages if you'd like to pursue. <code>]]</code> 12:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:20, 18 April 2016
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
The Signpost: 23 March 2016
- News and notes: Lila Tretikov a Young Global Leader; Wikipediocracy blog post sparks indefinite blocks
- In the media: Angolan file sharers cause trouble for Misplaced Pages Zero; the 3D printer edit war; a culture based on change and turmoil
- Traffic report: Be weary on the Ides of March
- Editorial: "God damn it, you've got to be kind."
- Featured content: Watch out! A slave trader, a live mascot and a crested serpent awaits!
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel article 3 case amended
- Misplaced Pages Weekly: Podcast #120: Status of Wikimania 2016
The Signpost: 1 April 2016
- News and notes: Trump/Wales 2016
- WikiProject report: Why should the Devil have all the good music? An interview with WikiProject Christian music
- Traffic report: Donald v Daredevil
- Featured content: A slow, slow week
- Technology report: Browse Misplaced Pages in safety? Use Telnet!
- Recent research: "Employing Misplaced Pages for good not evil" in education; using eyetracking to find out how readers read articles
- Misplaced Pages Weekly: Podcast #121: How April Fools went down
Has it really been 5 months
since I last stopped in? I thought it was just a few weeks. I can make no promises but hope to do some editing again. Life's been busy. Zad68 14:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- I know the feeling. Good to see you still around. Happy editing! Yobol (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- As usual, I agree with Yobol... Dbrodbeck (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yay! Hi! Jytdog (talk) 19:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Zad68! You have been missed. I've lost count of how many times an editor/admin has pinged you on a discussion so you could offer a comment when you were on your Wikibreak. Glad to see you back for whatever time you can devote to the project. Liz 13:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Liz! It feels nice to be missed. I'm just going to do what I can.
Zad6814:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Liz! It feels nice to be missed. I'm just going to do what I can.
- Yay! Good to see you back. Alexbrn (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Outing
It's long standing fact that you don't ask people to identify themselves on this project. But I guess if you're covering for your buddy than we can just throw that out the door.--v/r - TP 17:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- I find it perculiar that you came back at the exact right time to help out your friend, can you be clear here - were you or were you not contacted off-wiki about this issue?--v/r - TP 17:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- TParis your comments don't appear to be connecting to the history, and that's disappointing to see, but I don't feel like I'm going to change your thinking on that at this time, so I'm not going to pursue it. To answer the question you asked: No.
Zad6817:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- TParis your comments don't appear to be connecting to the history, and that's disappointing to see, but I don't feel like I'm going to change your thinking on that at this time, so I'm not going to pursue it. To answer the question you asked: No.
The Signpost: 14 April 2016
- News and notes: Denny Vrandečić resigns from Wikimedia Foundation board
- In the media: Wikimedia Sweden loses copyright case; Tex Watson; AI assistants; David Jolly biography
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: A welcome return to pop culture and death
- Arbitration report: The first case of 2016—Wikicology
- Gallery: A history lesson
Deleting research that you don't agree with
If you don't like my citations to and quotations of research articles, then post your own research that furthers your POV since that seems to be your game. My edits added research on both sides of the issue. Your further improper reverts will be challenged. Post research -- don't censor research that you don't like. Antisoapbox (talk) 00:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Antisoapbox sorry that you feel that way. On Misplaced Pages there are many content policies that cover things such as high-quality sourcing, verifiability and due weight, that direct what's appropriate for articles and what isn't. I see that others have disagreed with your changes as well, those are best handled at the individual article Talk pages if you'd like to pursue.
Zad6812:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)