| Revision as of 21:46, 25 May 2016 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits →Hey m80!: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:50, 25 May 2016 edit undoWikiEditorial101 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,649 edits →Hey m80!Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ::First of all, I have already walked away from that mess. If you were paying attention you'd see that. I have no desire to waste any more of my time there. Secondly, I have not violated any policy, as I merely stated my honest observations (whether correct or not). Thirdly, I have no problem with a 24-hour block; please be my guest, as I didn't plan on making any edits in the next couple of days anyway. If your intention is to frighten me, I'm afraid that you've failed. I hate to dignify your bullying/intimidation (which actually ''is'' a violation of policy) with a response, but I find it a bit weird that some guy pops up out of nowhere to try and strongarm me concerning a matter that I have already disengaged from and was never in the wrong for in the first place. ] (]) 18:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | ::First of all, I have already walked away from that mess. If you were paying attention you'd see that. I have no desire to waste any more of my time there. Secondly, I have not violated any policy, as I merely stated my honest observations (whether correct or not). Thirdly, I have no problem with a 24-hour block; please be my guest, as I didn't plan on making any edits in the next couple of days anyway. If your intention is to frighten me, I'm afraid that you've failed. I hate to dignify your bullying/intimidation (which actually ''is'' a violation of policy) with a response, but I find it a bit weird that some guy pops up out of nowhere to try and strongarm me concerning a matter that I have already disengaged from and was never in the wrong for in the first place. ] (]) 18:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::No my intention was not to frighten you - it was to inform you that you have violated ] and that if you had intended to continue, you should be blocked. I am glad you are walking away from the article, please don't return to it. Please do take on board that your actions violated policy and if you don't understand why, please ask. The ANI is there and will be used should you ever do anything like this again. But please do ask if you don't understand the issue. Thanks again for walking away from the article. ] (]) 21:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | :::No my intention was not to frighten you - it was to inform you that you have violated ] and that if you had intended to continue, you should be blocked. I am glad you are walking away from the article, please don't return to it. Please do take on board that your actions violated policy and if you don't understand why, please ask. The ANI is there and will be used should you ever do anything like this again. But please do ask if you don't understand the issue. Thanks again for walking away from the article. ] (]) 21:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Face it, you showed up to the brawl too late, cowboy. ] (]) 21:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:50, 25 May 2016
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Hey m80!
Please see Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Canvassing.2C_BLP_Revenge_editing.2C_and_laughable_accusations_of_sockpuppetry_by_WikiEditorial101 Brustopher (talk) 07:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- I believe your behavior has violated WP:BLPCOI and I have called for you to be blocked for 24 hours. If you will agree to walk away from the Richard J. Jensen and not come back you can probably avoid that. You have raised some concerns that were valid and other people are now aware of them. Please let others deal with them now. If you will agree to walk away from the article please post that at ANI and I will withdraw my proposal. Please do that - your ongoing involvement is not going to be helpful here. Ball is in your court; I hope you choose wisely. Jytdog (talk) 18:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- First of all, I have already walked away from that mess. If you were paying attention you'd see that. I have no desire to waste any more of my time there. Secondly, I have not violated any policy, as I merely stated my honest observations (whether correct or not). Thirdly, I have no problem with a 24-hour block; please be my guest, as I didn't plan on making any edits in the next couple of days anyway. If your intention is to frighten me, I'm afraid that you've failed. I hate to dignify your bullying/intimidation (which actually is a violation of policy) with a response, but I find it a bit weird that some guy pops up out of nowhere to try and strongarm me concerning a matter that I have already disengaged from and was never in the wrong for in the first place. WikiEditorial101 (talk) 18:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- No my intention was not to frighten you - it was to inform you that you have violated WP:BLPCOI and that if you had intended to continue, you should be blocked. I am glad you are walking away from the article, please don't return to it. Please do take on board that your actions violated policy and if you don't understand why, please ask. The ANI is there and will be used should you ever do anything like this again. But please do ask if you don't understand the issue. Thanks again for walking away from the article. Jytdog (talk) 21:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Face it, you showed up to the brawl too late, cowboy. WikiEditorial101 (talk) 21:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- No my intention was not to frighten you - it was to inform you that you have violated WP:BLPCOI and that if you had intended to continue, you should be blocked. I am glad you are walking away from the article, please don't return to it. Please do take on board that your actions violated policy and if you don't understand why, please ask. The ANI is there and will be used should you ever do anything like this again. But please do ask if you don't understand the issue. Thanks again for walking away from the article. Jytdog (talk) 21:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- First of all, I have already walked away from that mess. If you were paying attention you'd see that. I have no desire to waste any more of my time there. Secondly, I have not violated any policy, as I merely stated my honest observations (whether correct or not). Thirdly, I have no problem with a 24-hour block; please be my guest, as I didn't plan on making any edits in the next couple of days anyway. If your intention is to frighten me, I'm afraid that you've failed. I hate to dignify your bullying/intimidation (which actually is a violation of policy) with a response, but I find it a bit weird that some guy pops up out of nowhere to try and strongarm me concerning a matter that I have already disengaged from and was never in the wrong for in the first place. WikiEditorial101 (talk) 18:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)