| Revision as of 23:21, 5 August 2016 editAspirex (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,836 edits →State of Origin← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:28, 5 August 2016 edit undoAspirex (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,836 edits →State of OriginNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| I have no idea what your talking about. There is nothing wrong with my style and grammar. And if you want to talk about Due Weight there is a lot of things that you deleted that aren't covered in your version, which describe the fabric of Interstate football. And most importantly everything I've added is sourced. So if you have problems with sourced material or style there are proper avenues to go down, I suggest you go down one of those.] (]) 11:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC) | I have no idea what your talking about. There is nothing wrong with my style and grammar. And if you want to talk about Due Weight there is a lot of things that you deleted that aren't covered in your version, which describe the fabric of Interstate football. And most importantly everything I've added is sourced. So if you have problems with sourced material or style there are proper avenues to go down, I suggest you go down one of those.] (]) 11:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| *What I have done now is the following. I have noticed now that the exact same content from ] was already on the three team pages (], ] and ]) in the same level of detail. That content is better suited to those team pages, and having it in the same level of detail on the overall interstate football page bogs it down. I've done minor edits to fix up the grammar and remove some of the puffing on those team pages (and I believe there are still improvements to be made), but I've left the vast majority of the content in tact. I've then reverted to the summary style on the overall interstate football page. That seems like a fair solution, wouldn't you say? ] (]) 23:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC) | *What I have done now is the following. I have noticed now that the exact same content from ] was already on the three team pages (], ] and ]) in the same level of detail. That content is better suited to those team pages, and having it in the same level of detail on the overall interstate football page bogs it down. I've done minor edits to fix up the grammar and remove some of the puffing on those team pages (and I believe there are still improvements to be made), but I've left the vast majority of the content in tact and have no intention to make any other major deletions from those team pages. I've then reverted to the summary style on the overall interstate football page. That seems like a fair and reasonable solution, wouldn't you say? ] (]) 23:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ] '''You are suspected of ]''', which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the ], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-socksuspect --> | ] '''You are suspected of ]''', which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the ], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-socksuspect --> | ||
Revision as of 23:28, 5 August 2016
State of Origin
In my view, the sections you have been contributing to regarding state of origin football do not need any further quotes. These sections already read somewhat stiltedly with a string of player quotes with no context. Thanks. Aspirex (talk) 06:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm not going to spend a lot of time arguing with you this year. From your language style and editing patterns, you are clearly the same editor who previously edited under the name User:SportsEditor518. There is an article ban on you relating to Interstate matches in Australian rules football which you are evading with your new user name. The fact that I have copyedited your contributions down (addressing style, grammar and due weight issues) rather than deleting them outright represents good faith on my part. But if you revert my copyedit again, I'm going to report you for sockpuppetry and block evasion. Aspirex (talk) 11:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
I have no idea what your talking about. There is nothing wrong with my style and grammar. And if you want to talk about Due Weight there is a lot of things that you deleted that aren't covered in your version, which describe the fabric of Interstate football. And most importantly everything I've added is sourced. So if you have problems with sourced material or style there are proper avenues to go down, I suggest you go down one of those.Qwermnbv12 (talk) 11:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- What I have done now is the following. I have noticed now that the exact same content from Interstate matches in Australian rules football was already on the three team pages (Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia) in the same level of detail. That content is better suited to those team pages, and having it in the same level of detail on the overall interstate football page bogs it down. I've done minor edits to fix up the grammar and remove some of the puffing on those team pages (and I believe there are still improvements to be made), but I've left the vast majority of the content in tact and have no intention to make any other major deletions from those team pages. I've then reverted to the summary style on the overall interstate football page. That seems like a fair and reasonable solution, wouldn't you say? Aspirex (talk) 23:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SportsEditor518. Thank you.