Misplaced Pages

:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:23, 6 September 2016 editHBC AIV helperbot (talk | contribs)Bots66,367 edits 1 IP & 7 users left. rm 185.54.163.195 (blocked 31 hours by Ponyo (AO ACB)).← Previous edit Revision as of 22:27, 6 September 2016 edit undoJDC808 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers72,110 edits User-reportedNext edit →
Line 35: Line 35:
****Comment: ] has been disrupting the page by continuously removing content when a discussion on said matter is currently in place. He is claiming I have vandalized, but it appears that this user does not know what vandalism means, and has in fact himself teetered into the waters of committing vandalism by continuously reverting the page to his preferred version before a consensus has been met. I am not the only editor who has pointed the discussion out to him. Yes, I did revert him multiple times, but only to put the articles back at the version of pre-consensus. Here are the article histories for the articles in question: , , , and . Also, I had left a comment on his , but he just brushed it off and ignored it. --] ] 22:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC) ****Comment: ] has been disrupting the page by continuously removing content when a discussion on said matter is currently in place. He is claiming I have vandalized, but it appears that this user does not know what vandalism means, and has in fact himself teetered into the waters of committing vandalism by continuously reverting the page to his preferred version before a consensus has been met. I am not the only editor who has pointed the discussion out to him. Yes, I did revert him multiple times, but only to put the articles back at the version of pre-consensus. Here are the article histories for the articles in question: , , , and . Also, I had left a comment on his , but he just brushed it off and ignored it. --] ] 22:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
*****Comment: As the user literally just proved for me, he continues to make edits without reading comments from other editors. On this exact page he claims "a discussion on the matter is currently in place", I pointed out in this exact thread that the discussion was only for the page title and not its contents, he ignored it on this page, he ignored it in the edit summary. Additionally placed his comment out of chronological order so it could be read ahead of other comments. ] (]) 22:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC) *****Comment: As the user literally just proved for me, he continues to make edits without reading comments from other editors. On this exact page he claims "a discussion on the matter is currently in place", I pointed out in this exact thread that the discussion was only for the page title and not its contents, he ignored it on this page, he ignored it in the edit summary. Additionally placed his comment out of chronological order so it could be read ahead of other comments. ] (]) 22:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
******{{Comment}} Please stop assuming things. The discussions do in fact apply to the whole articles. My comment was placed "out of chronological order" as you've stated because it was a direct reply to the report, not the two replies following it (those comments were also saying where this report should have been made, and were not commenting on the contents of the report itself). Sufficient information has been supplied to the administrators. --] ] 22:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
*{{vandal|Weweremarshall}} in trying to stop the vandalism conducted by the user reported, I believe I myself have committed vandalism because of the amount of times I had to undo his vandalism. Though I didn't violate 3RR on a specific page, I did across multiple pages. I don't know if this counts but felt it necessary to submit myself for review. ] (]) 22:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC) *{{vandal|Weweremarshall}} in trying to stop the vandalism conducted by the user reported, I believe I myself have committed vandalism because of the amount of times I had to undo his vandalism. Though I didn't violate 3RR on a specific page, I did across multiple pages. I don't know if this counts but felt it necessary to submit myself for review. ] (]) 22:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
:*This is a case for ] or ], this noticeboard is only for obvious vandalism.] (]) 22:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC) :*This is a case for ] or ], this noticeboard is only for obvious vandalism.] (]) 22:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:27, 6 September 2016

"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. Shortcut

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 00:44 on 8 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
    Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    Categories: