| Revision as of 07:02, 8 September 2016 editViperSnake151 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers109,648 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on iPhone 7. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:03, 8 September 2016 edit undoViperSnake151 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers109,648 edits Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="border:1px solid #445A38;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 07:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC) | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="border:1px solid #445A38;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 07:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. <span style="border:1px solid #445A38;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 07:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:03, 8 September 2016
February 2016
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Little Door Gods has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wood flooring has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wood flooring was changed by Llcoolj89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856914 on 2016-07-29T16:48:44+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- I have manually reverted the bot edit of your reference addition, ie restored, assuming seems to be a good faith edit - false positive - commercial but not promotional - and is appropriately placed reference in context. Aoziwe (talk) 11:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Table tennis. Misplaced Pages is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Misplaced Pages uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.
It seems like your only edits so far have been to add references to articles, and I'm afraid that almost none of the references you have added is appropriate. Please take a moment to familiarise yourself with Misplaced Pages's external links policy and what a reliable source (that can be used as a referece) is. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 06:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at iPhone 7 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ViperSnake151 Talk 07:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Llcoolj89 reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: ). Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 07:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)