| Revision as of 21:28, 15 October 2016 editThe Banner (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers125,313 edits →Wikihounding?← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:58, 16 October 2016 edit undoSleeping is fun (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,103 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :::::::My behaviour? What exactly did I do wrong? You stalked my edits and actively harassed me, I called you out on it, you told me to "get over it", then you tried playing innocent, and now you're pretending to be the victim. Ahahahaha. —] (]) 18:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | :::::::My behaviour? What exactly did I do wrong? You stalked my edits and actively harassed me, I called you out on it, you told me to "get over it", then you tried playing innocent, and now you're pretending to be the victim. Ahahahaha. —] (]) 18:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::::I take offence of your highly aggressive behaviour and personal attacks. This is not the way to engage in meaningful discussion or cooperation. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 21:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ::::::::I take offence of your highly aggressive behaviour and personal attacks. This is not the way to engage in meaningful discussion or cooperation. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 21:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::My behavior isn't even remotely aggressive, and I haven't made a single personal attack against you. Again, you are trying to lie and play the victim because you know fully well that you engaged in harassment; I see right through your tactics. If you really cared about meaningful cooperation, then you wouldn't have harassed me in the first place. —] (]) 00:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:58, 16 October 2016
Wikihounding?
I do not know what you understand under wikihounding but reverting unhelpful edits is certainly not wikihounding. Try to accept criticism from others. The Banner talk 22:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- "Criticism"? Oh please. Going through a person's edit history, reverting edits which follow the MOS, and blindly calling them "unhelpful" is not criticism, it's harassment. —Wash whites separately (talk) 06:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- You have some mighty long toes. Get over it. The Banner talk 07:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
And often what you claim as "overlinking", leaves items with no links at all. Like René Redzepi, where you removed the only link to Denmark. The Banner talk 07:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- If you even bothered to read the WP:OVERLINKING page, you would know that major countries and nationalities are not linked unless they explain something important about the subject. Very seldom does the article for an entire country impart anything crucially relevant to the particular person. That was a hilarious attempt at a comeback up there, by the way. —Wash whites separately (talk) 08:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- You can tone down a bit. No personal attacks please. And as the WP:Overlinking claims: It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. You use it as a law written in stone instead of looking at it with common sense. (Yes, I have seen that you removed multiple instances of the United States in an article. I can agree with that. But just 1 link constitutes no overlinking.) The Banner talk 08:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- I never used personal attacks...? You're the one who told me to "get over it" when I called you out for stalking my edits and making unconstructive reverts. I am using common sense—if you want to know more about the individual, link to the city or town they are from, not the entire country. —Wash whites separately (talk) 08:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- You started about wikihounding and harrassing, remember. The Banner talk 16:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Accusing you of doing things you actually were doing is not a personal attack. When confronted with accusations of harassment, you told me to "get over it", so you knew fully well what you were doing, and now you're playing innocent. —Wash whites separately (talk) 11:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- LOL, nice try to blame me for your own behaviour. Unfortunately, I do not buy that. The Banner talk 17:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- My behaviour? What exactly did I do wrong? You stalked my edits and actively harassed me, I called you out on it, you told me to "get over it", then you tried playing innocent, and now you're pretending to be the victim. Ahahahaha. —Wash whites separately (talk) 18:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I take offence of your highly aggressive behaviour and personal attacks. This is not the way to engage in meaningful discussion or cooperation. The Banner talk 21:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- My behavior isn't even remotely aggressive, and I haven't made a single personal attack against you. Again, you are trying to lie and play the victim because you know fully well that you engaged in harassment; I see right through your tactics. If you really cared about meaningful cooperation, then you wouldn't have harassed me in the first place. —Wash whites separately (talk) 00:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- I take offence of your highly aggressive behaviour and personal attacks. This is not the way to engage in meaningful discussion or cooperation. The Banner talk 21:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- My behaviour? What exactly did I do wrong? You stalked my edits and actively harassed me, I called you out on it, you told me to "get over it", then you tried playing innocent, and now you're pretending to be the victim. Ahahahaha. —Wash whites separately (talk) 18:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- LOL, nice try to blame me for your own behaviour. Unfortunately, I do not buy that. The Banner talk 17:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Accusing you of doing things you actually were doing is not a personal attack. When confronted with accusations of harassment, you told me to "get over it", so you knew fully well what you were doing, and now you're playing innocent. —Wash whites separately (talk) 11:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- You started about wikihounding and harrassing, remember. The Banner talk 16:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- I never used personal attacks...? You're the one who told me to "get over it" when I called you out for stalking my edits and making unconstructive reverts. I am using common sense—if you want to know more about the individual, link to the city or town they are from, not the entire country. —Wash whites separately (talk) 08:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- You can tone down a bit. No personal attacks please. And as the WP:Overlinking claims: It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. You use it as a law written in stone instead of looking at it with common sense. (Yes, I have seen that you removed multiple instances of the United States in an article. I can agree with that. But just 1 link constitutes no overlinking.) The Banner talk 08:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)