| Revision as of 04:41, 8 September 2006 editEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,806 edits →Block of Grace Note: administrative action involving Grace Note, best left to uninvolved admins← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:46, 8 September 2006 edit undoKyorosuke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,593 edits →Block of Grace NoteNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| Hello. In light of your troubled off and on-wiki history and personal disputes with Grace Note, please refrain from blocking him indefinitely for "trolling" — leave administrative action involving himself to uninvolved admins. Feel free to follow any ] steps, however. Thanks. ] 04:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC) | Hello. In light of your troubled off and on-wiki history and personal disputes with Grace Note, please refrain from blocking him indefinitely for "trolling" — leave administrative action involving himself to uninvolved admins. Feel free to follow any ] steps, however. Thanks. ] 04:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I won't stand in your way if you want to let what's supposed to be an encyclopedia become a playground for malcontents.--] | ] 04:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:46, 8 September 2006
| Notability |
|---|
| General notability guideline |
| Subject-specific guidelines |
| See also |
- Do:
LostCasts AfD decision
Thank you! I don't know where you came from (i.e., out of the blue) but this was very unexpected. I'm mystified as to how that other, non-admin user could have "closed" the discussion. In any case, thanks. PKtm 03:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Heh. I was reading Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 August 25, looking for discussions to close when I came across it.--SB | T 03:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking care of this! Jtrost ( | C | #) 18:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Sean, you're a good editor and a good admin, and I'm not here picking a fight. I just want to ask if perhaps you could tone down the rhetoric in your edit summaries just a little? Sure we can probably all take it, but is there any need to adopt language which can be read as confrontational or dismissive? You don't like something, fair play, but there's ways and means. Take it easy regardless, Steve block Talk 19:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- A week ago you blocked me for seven days, giving as the reason, "Date formatting idiocy; has been persistently warned."
- This is a very stiff initial block, and I would appreciate it if you could point out to me which of my edits you found to be the most idiotic. --Jumbo 16:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
E-mail for you, Sean. SlimVirgin 15:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Piggy says hi
--Keitei (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Block of Grace Note
Hello. In light of your troubled off and on-wiki history and personal disputes with Grace Note, please refrain from blocking him indefinitely for "trolling" — leave administrative action involving himself to uninvolved admins. Feel free to follow any dispute resolution steps, however. Thanks. El_C 04:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- I won't stand in your way if you want to let what's supposed to be an encyclopedia become a playground for malcontents.--SB | T 04:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)