| Revision as of 10:19, 14 November 2004 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:47, 14 November 2004 edit undoHerschelkrustofsky (talk | contribs)2,877 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I'm curious to know why you worded it that way, because that is the exact phrase that was used by the Lyndon LaRouche Executive Intelligence Review. Quoting the EIR without saying it's coming from them may make the article less NPOV. ] | I'm curious to know why you worded it that way, because that is the exact phrase that was used by the Lyndon LaRouche Executive Intelligence Review. Quoting the EIR without saying it's coming from them may make the article less NPOV. ] | ||
| Actually, my edit said "appointed a ''pro bono'' lawyer", which is not quite as incongruous as "hired," but I have changed it to "arranged for a ''pro bono'' lawyer." My information did come from ''EIR'', just as your information came presumably from the ''Post'' and/or the ''Independent''. I linked all three sources at the bottom of the article. --] 15:47, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:47, 14 November 2004
User:Herschelkrustofsky has added to the section on Jeremiah Duggan that Baroness Symons has "hired a pro bono lawyer" to help the Duggan family. How can the minister have hired a pro bono lawyer? A lawyer who works pro bono is one working for the public good and not charging anyone. So in what sense was he "hired" by the minster?
I'm curious to know why you worded it that way, because that is the exact phrase that was used by the Lyndon LaRouche Executive Intelligence Review. Quoting the EIR without saying it's coming from them may make the article less NPOV. user:SlimVirgin
Actually, my edit said "appointed a pro bono lawyer", which is not quite as incongruous as "hired," but I have changed it to "arranged for a pro bono lawyer." My information did come from EIR, just as your information came presumably from the Post and/or the Independent. I linked all three sources at the bottom of the article. --Herschelkrustofsky 15:47, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)