Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Kris Senanu: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:23, 21 October 2016 editRollingFace99 (talk | contribs)76 edits →Kris Senanu: bold fixTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Revision as of 04:18, 26 October 2016 edit undoNorthamerica1000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators708,032 edits Closing debate, result was speedy keepNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''speedy keep'''. '''speedy keep''' per ] A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. (e.g. such as whether or not the subject meets ], ], etc). For examples of valid deletion rationales, see ]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 04:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Kris Senanu}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Kris Senanu}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 7: Line 14:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 09:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 09:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)</small>
* '''Keep'''. Quick online search produced enough sources to easily pass ]. I've added these links to the article and removed a big amount of puffery. ] (]) 13:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC) * '''Keep'''. Quick online search produced enough sources to easily pass ]. I've added these links to the article and removed a big amount of puffery. ] (]) 13:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 04:18, 26 October 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. speedy keep per WP:SK#1 A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. (e.g. such as whether or not the subject meets WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, etc). For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America 04:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Kris Senanu

Kris Senanu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article is poorly sourced jane22 09:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.