| Revision as of 19:31, 9 September 2006 editMookiesDad (talk | contribs)186 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:24, 10 September 2006 edit undoMookiesDad (talk | contribs)186 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Since you like to quote WIki rules so much, try this on for size: | |||
| The Three-revert rule (or 3RR) is an official policy which applies to all Wikipedians. The policy states that an editor must not perform more than three reversions, in whole or in part, on a single Misplaced Pages article within a 24 hour period. This does not imply that reverting three times or fewer is acceptable. In excessive cases, people can be blocked for edit warring or disruption even if they do not revert more than three times per day. | |||
| ] 02:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hey genius - why don't you be more careful when you "edit" (read vandalize)? | Hey genius - why don't you be more careful when you "edit" (read vandalize)? | ||
| You deleted the 1st TS Sr. title. | You deleted the 1st TS Sr. title. | ||
Revision as of 02:24, 10 September 2006
Since you like to quote WIki rules so much, try this on for size: The Three-revert rule (or 3RR) is an official policy which applies to all Wikipedians. The policy states that an editor must not perform more than three reversions, in whole or in part, on a single Misplaced Pages article within a 24 hour period. This does not imply that reverting three times or fewer is acceptable. In excessive cases, people can be blocked for edit warring or disruption even if they do not revert more than three times per day. MookiesDad 02:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey genius - why don't you be more careful when you "edit" (read vandalize)? You deleted the 1st TS Sr. title. You think all I have to do is run around cleaning up your messes? MookiesDad 02:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- "MookiesDad, here is a quote from vandalism: "If a user treats situations which are not clear vandalism as vandalism, then he or she is actually damaging the encyclopedia by driving away potential editors." -Scott Dickerson Doxmyth 18:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
- That presupposes you have an actual contribution to make, which you don't seem to have (if you do, you haven't exhibited it yet). As far as I can see, you've vandalized the list of TS Sr. titles, presented uncited speculation as fact and promoted your own off-topic web site. Why do I consider your "site" off-topic - because it doesn't supply any information on any of the various series, it's just your monumental ego trip. Every reviewer of your "fiction" has declared it poor and juvenile. Get it? NOBODY LIKES IT! It's not relevant to the Tom Swift page of Wiki. I will remove your link and "Predecessors" paragraph any time you post it. I'm retired and have nothing but time on my hands and I dislike whining crybabies. MookiesDad 19:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)