| Revision as of 22:33, 10 September 2006 editSFC9394 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,876 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:42, 10 September 2006 edit undoNandesuka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,890 edits →[]: speedyNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| :{{lt|User AS400 CL}} | :{{lt|User AS400 CL}} | ||
| New replacement outside of main template space is at {{tlu|User:UserBox/AS400-CL}}. — ] | ] 20:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | New replacement outside of main template space is at {{tlu|User:UserBox/AS400-CL}}. — ] | ] 20:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| {subst:at} '''Speedy delete''' per CSDs A6 and T1. ] 22:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 53: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - More harm than worth. If falsely accused, then the sockpuppet check will come up with no evidence and will be removed. It has happened to me. Sad, but responding with this template is worse. -- ] 21:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - More harm than worth. If falsely accused, then the sockpuppet check will come up with no evidence and will be removed. It has happened to me. Sad, but responding with this template is worse. -- ] 21:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Delete''' ] 21:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy Delete''' ] 21:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
Revision as of 22:42, 10 September 2006
| < September 9 | September 11 > |
|---|
September 10
Template:Infobox Extratropical Cyclone
- Template:Infobox Extratropical Cyclone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Infobox Extratropical Cyclone 01A (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This template is used on one article that contains original research and copyright violations. It incorporates a category system, which does not exist for extratropical cyclones, and has no real hope of being used on any other articles. Also nominating Template:Infobox Extratropical Cyclone 01A, as instead of using the original template, the creator made a separate template for the article in question. Coredesat talk. o_O 21:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, the category scale is OR itself. I also note the existence of the well-constructed {{infobox winter storm}} and {{infobox hurricane}} either of which could be adapted into a good template for this kind of weather phenomenon (should a need arise).--Nilfanion (talk) 21:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:Los Angeles USD
This template is already ugly and large. If it is completely populated with all of the schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District, there would be 1,035 total schools . This is a very good example of where a category (see Los Angeles Unified School District) or a list is much better than a template. This template should be deleted post-haste. 20:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete!. 20:29, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Though, it can be changed to reflect only high schools and/or middle schools - Elementary schools can be given a different template. Or it can be divided by LAUSD administrative region. WhisperToMe 20:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, better handled by category or list. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:User AS400 CL
New replacement outside of main template space is at {{User:UserBox/AS400-CL}}. — MrDolomite | Talk 20:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
{subst:at} Speedy delete per CSDs A6 and T1. Nandesuka 22:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:False accuser
Attack template - created with no community discussion or consensus - probably a speedy candidate SFC9394 19:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
A template created in order to counter false allegations of sockpuppetry. Orkadian 19:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong keep: I have suffered at the hands of false sockpuppetry accusations. (Indeed, User:Orkadian, above, has even been accused of being a sockpuppet of me!) It is one form of harassment that has put me off contributing to Misplaced Pages. This template certainly has my consensus! Mallimak 20:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- To other editors - please be aware this template has no consensus, policy, guideline or discussion to back it up - it was created unilaterally by Orkadian who has been engaging in a borderline harassment of another editor, and created to aid in that attack. Convenient that mailmark is back on the scene - just as one of Orkadian's templates is up for deletion. SFC9394 20:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Just to put everyone in the picture, I am not conveniently "back on the scene". User:Orkadian contacted me to tell me what is going on. He is sick to death of User:Mais oui!'s harassement. He had barely started out on Misplaced Pages when he was struck down with sockpuppet accusations from Mais oui! that he was me. I had received so much harassment from User:Mais oui! that I gave up contributing. (All my edits are monitored by Mais oui! and reverted.) There seems to be no defence against harassment on Misplaced Pages. I fully support Orkadian here. Mallimak 20:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- "User:Orkadian contacted me to tell me what is going on" - his contribs say he hasn't posted on your talk page in a week. Something doesn't add up. SFC9394 21:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages talk pages are not the only way in the universe to contact somebody! Mallimak 22:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- "User:Orkadian contacted me to tell me what is going on" - his contribs say he hasn't posted on your talk page in a week. Something doesn't add up. SFC9394 21:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed there is - if I was wrongly accused of being a sock then the first thing I would do would be to not engage in unlogged communication with that person. This isn't the place for a sock discussion - but the editing patterns of both editors is highly suggestive of multiple accounts. Tonight Orkadian edits up to 20:56 - I put a template up for deletion - then 6 minutes later you are editing (after 3 days of not posting anything) and nothing more is heard from Orkadian for the evening. Indeed you post an afd notice on a user's talk page, , before you even post here. Why on earth would a user independent of Orkadian be posting such messages before even commenting on the deletion itself? TBH if you were sensible you would drop the sock - that would allow you to fight whatever battles you want here at WP (and god knows there are plenty of people who are here to do nothing but fight battles). Operating with socks is just going to lead to any point you try and make being completely undermined. SFC9394 22:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Question: are we going to have a "false accuser of false accusery" template too? ;) j/k I don't see this is any worse than the sockpuppet templat unless it is misused. Is it possible to put these in userspace and avoid upsetting people? FWIW, i'm not a fan of the sockpuppet template, it is OK at wiki to edit under one username as long as you don't use them both to advocate the same position or get around blocks, yet I see allegattions of "socks" whenever it is uncovered that one user uses different names. Justforasecond 20:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. 20:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as an attack template. --Coredesat talk. o_O 21:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as an attack template. Either someone acted in good faith adding a Sockpuppet tag, in which case why attack them, or they have a habit of adding them on little or no evidence, in which case work with them and explain why this is a Bad Idea, or if they continue and are disruptive to the project, use dispute resolution, or if this is all they do for no reason, they're a bv and therefore ban them. This template is worse than useless; it exists only to attack and does not address the possible situations where this template might, by a hostile and childish person, be considered applicable. One puppy's opinion. KillerChihuahua 21:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - More harm than worth. If falsely accused, then the sockpuppet check will come up with no evidence and will be removed. It has happened to me. Sad, but responding with this template is worse. -- Avi 21:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete RN 21:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Template:Philippines
This template is 100% redundant with Template:Indy Philippine cities, Template:Metro Manila, and Template:Philippine regions. It's unnecessary, and I suggest it be deleted. --Coffee 15:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:Usbob FC squad
This template is only being used by two members on their user pages. If they want to use it so much, they can use the coding on their pages instead. -- Mattythewhite 14:16, 10/9/06
Template:Wars of Israel
Out of date and nothing links here -- Kendrick7 10:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Israel-Lebanon conflict
Just a single-article transclusion of {{Infobox Military Conflict}}; delete it like all the others. Kirill Lokshin 06:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:Unproven sockpuppeteer
No reason ever to tag user accounts as being sockpuppets if it can't be proved. It looks like this would only be used for harrasment. PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 05:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's for the benefit of accused users, not to harrass them. The current template is being used for users that are not proven sockpuppeteers. This provides an alternative. Justforasecond 05:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- There is already Template:Sockpuppet for when there is a shred of evidence but not fully proven. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 05:29, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's for the benefit of accused users, not to harrass them. The current template is being used for users that are not proven sockpuppeteers. This provides an alternative. Justforasecond 05:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm. So there is a template that is used when it can't be proven? Why is the newer one more harrassing? It goes out of its way to assume good faith. Justforasecond 06:00, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Unfortunately, I think this will bring more harm than good, and should be removed. -- Avi 20:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. 20:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Justforasecond 20:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete little benefit, extreme abuse potential. RN 21:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:Hawaii_State_Highways
These templates tend to be red link farms, and a list and category are much useful. (Although this needs to be checked against the current list before deletion, as it is inaccurate too). VA's got deleted, OR too... Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. A list page is highly preferred over this method. Also, if browsing the state highway system is an issue, there's no reason why a browse template/browse in the infobox can't be used. Precedent here at TfD also shows that templates showing the entire state highway system are candidates for deletion for the reasons given in the nomination (lists and categories are preferred). --TMF 04:51, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah... Hawaii is messed up right now with two lists, an incorrect NC on one of them... once the poll finishes we need to get that straightened out. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per TwinsMetsFan. Michael 08:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per above. 20:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)