| Revision as of 13:45, 15 September 2006 view sourceRamitmahajan (talk | contribs)10,213 edits Revert to revision 75871259 dated 2006-09-15 12:13:08 by MER-C using popups← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:57, 15 September 2006 view source 193.220.217.43 (talk) →Consequences of the warNext edit → | ||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
| "]", which was launched by Pakistan to capture ], a town north-east of ] and a key region for communications between Kashmir and the rest of India, was also a failure. Many Pakistani critics have criticized the Ayub Khan administration for being indecisive during Operation Grand Slam. They claim that the operation failed because Ayub Khan knew the importance of Akhnur to India (having called it India's "]") and did not want to capture it and drive the two nations into an all out war. Despite progress made in Akhnur, General Ayub Khan for some inexplicable reason relieved the commanding ] of charge and replaced him with Gen. ]. A 24 hour lull ensued, which allowed the Indian army to regroup in Akhnur and oppose a lackluster attack headed by General Yahya Khan. "The enemy came to our rescue", asserted the Indian Chief of Staff of the Western Command. Many authors like Stephen Philip Cohen, have consistently viewed that Pakistan Army "acquired an exaggerated view of the weakness of both India and the Indian military... the 1965 war was a shock". As a result most of the blame was heaped on the leadership and little importance given to intelligence failures that persisted until the debacle of the ], when Pakistan was comprehensively defeated and dismembered by India, leading to the creation of ]. | "]", which was launched by Pakistan to capture ], a town north-east of ] and a key region for communications between Kashmir and the rest of India, was also a failure. Many Pakistani critics have criticized the Ayub Khan administration for being indecisive during Operation Grand Slam. They claim that the operation failed because Ayub Khan knew the importance of Akhnur to India (having called it India's "]") and did not want to capture it and drive the two nations into an all out war. Despite progress made in Akhnur, General Ayub Khan for some inexplicable reason relieved the commanding ] of charge and replaced him with Gen. ]. A 24 hour lull ensued, which allowed the Indian army to regroup in Akhnur and oppose a lackluster attack headed by General Yahya Khan. "The enemy came to our rescue", asserted the Indian Chief of Staff of the Western Command. Many authors like Stephen Philip Cohen, have consistently viewed that Pakistan Army "acquired an exaggerated view of the weakness of both India and the Indian military... the 1965 war was a shock". As a result most of the blame was heaped on the leadership and little importance given to intelligence failures that persisted until the debacle of the ], when Pakistan was comprehensively defeated and dismembered by India, leading to the creation of ]. | ||
| sdf asdf asdf asdf asdf sd fasf asd f | |||
| == Consequences of the war == | |||
| The war had created a tense state of affairs in its aftermath. Though the war was indecisive, Pakistan suffered much heavier material and personnel casualties compared to India. Many war historians believe that had the war continued, with growing losses and decreasing supplies, Pakistan would have been eventually defeated. India's decision to declare ceasefire with Pakistan caused some outrage among the Indian populace, who believed they had the upper hand. Both India and Pakistan increased their defense spending and the ] politics had taken roots in the subcontinent. Partly as a result of the inefficient information gathering, India established the ] for external ] and ]. India slowly started aligning with the ] both politically and militarily. This would be cemented formally years later before the ]. In light of the previous war against the Chinese, the performance in this war was viewed as a "politico-strategic" victory in India. | |||
| Many Pakistanis, rated the performance of their military positively. ] is celebrated as 'Defence Day' in Pakistan in commemoration of the successful defence of Sailkot against the Indian army. Pakistani Air Force's performance was seen in much better light compared to that of the Pakistani navy and army. However, the end game left a lot to desire as Pakistan had lost more ground than gained and more importantly did not achieve the goal of occupying Kashmir, which has been viewed by many impartial sources as a defeat for Pakistan.<ref> - ], - Interview with ]</ref> Many high ranking Pakistani officials and military experts later criticized the faulty planning in ] that ultimately led to the war. The Tashkent declaration was further seen as a raw deal in Pakistan though few citizens realised the gravity of the situation that existed at the end of the war. Under the advice of ], Pakistan's then foreign minister, Ayub Khan had raised very high expectations among the people of Pakistan about the superiority - if not invincibility - of its armed forces<ref></ref>, but Pakistan's inability to attain its military aims during the war, created a political liability on Ayub. The defeat of its Kashmiri ambitions in the war led to the army's invincibility being challenged by an increasingly vocal opposition. And with the war creating a huge financial burden, Pakistan's economy which had witnessed rapid progress in the early 60s, took a severe beating.<ref></ref> | |||
| Another negative consequence of the war was the growing resentment against the Pakistani government in ]. ] leaders accused the government for not providing adequate security for East Pakistan during the conflict, even though large sums of money were taken from the east to finance the war. ] was apprehensive of this situation, and the need for greater autonomy for the east led to ] between India and Pakistan in 1971. | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 15 September 2006
 | This article may be unbalanced toward certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page. |
| Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the Indo-Pakistani Wars | |||||||
 Map showing Indian administered Kashmir in shades of orange and Pakistan held kashmir in green hues. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
| India | Pakistan | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
| Gen J N Chaudhuri, Lt Gen Harbakhsh Singh | Field Marshal Ayub Khan, Gen Mohd Musa | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| 2,763 killed | 6,917 killed | ||||||
| Indo-Pakistani conflicts | |
|---|---|
| Kashmir conflict
Other conflicts Border skirmishes Strikes |
The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, also known as the Second Kashmir War, was the culmination of a series of skirmishes that occurred between April 1965 and September 1965 between India and Pakistan. The war was the second fought between India and Pakistan over the region of Kashmir, the first having been fought in 1947. The war lasted five weeks, resulted in thousands of casualties on both sides and ended in a United Nations (UN) mandated ceasefire. It is generally accepted that the war began following the failure of Pakistan's "Operation Gibraltar" which was designed to infiltrate and invade Jammu and Kashmir.
Much of the war was fought by the countries' land forces in the region of Kashmir and along the International Border (IB) between India and Pakistan. The war also involved a limited participation from the countries' respective air forces. This war saw the largest amassing of troops in Kashmir, a number that was overshadowed only during the 2001-2002 military standoff between India and Pakistan during which over a million troops were placed in combat positions in the region. Many details of this war, like those of most Indo-Pakistani Wars, remain unclear and riddled with media biases.
Pre war escalation
Fighting broke out between India and Pakistan in an area known as the Rann of Kutch, a barren region in the Indian state of Gujarat. Initially involving the border police from both nations, the disputed area soon witnessed intermittent skirmishes between the countries' armed forces firstly on March 20 and again in April 1965. In June the same year, British Prime Minister Harold Wilson successfully persuaded both countries to end hostilities and set up a tribunal to resolve the dispute. The verdict which came later in 1968, saw Pakistan gaining only 350 square miles (900 km²) of the Rann of Kutch of its original claim of 3500 sq miles.
After its successes in the Rann of Kutch, Pakistan, under the leadership of General Ayub Khan is said to have believed that the Indian Army was unable to defend itself against a quick military campaign in the disputed territory of Kashmir, following a loss to China in 1962. Pakistan believed that the population of Kashmir was generally discontented with Indian rule and that a resistance movement could be ignited by a few infiltrating saboteurs. This was codenamed Operation Gibraltar. For its part, Pakistan claimed to have been concerned by the attempts of India to absorb Kashmir - a state that Pakistan claims as "disputed", into the Indian union by way Articles 356 and 357 of the Indian Constitution allowing the President of India to declare President's Rule in the disputed state. Pakistan was taken aback by the lack of military and moral support by the United States, an ally with whom the country had signed an Agreement of Cooperation. The United States refused to come to Pakistan's aid and declared its neutrality in the war by cutting off military supplies to both sides.
The war
_.jpg){kind=link}
On August 15, 1965, Indian forces crossed the ceasefire line and launched an attack on Pakistan administered Kashmir, marking an official beginning to the war. Pakistani reports cite this attack as unprovoked. Indian reports cite the attack as a response to a tip the Indian forces received from Kashmiri civilians about Pakistani soldiers crossing the Line of Control (LoC) dressed as local Kashmiris. Most of the war was fought on land by each country's infantry and armored units, with substantial backing from their air forces. Initially, the Indian Army met with considerable success in the northern sector (Kashmir). After launching a prolonged artillery barrage against Pakistan, India was able to capture three important mountain positions. However, by the end of the month both sides were on even footing as Pakistan had made progress in areas such as Tithwal, Uri and Punch and India had gains in Pakistan Administered Kashmir (Azad Kashmir, Pakistan Occupied Kashmir), having captured the Haji Pir Pass eight kilometers inside Pakistani territory.
These territorial gains and rapid Indian advances were met with a counterattack by Pakistan in the southern sector (Punjab) where Indian forces, having been caught unprepared, faced technically superior Pakistani tanks and suffered heavy losses. India then called in its air force to target the Pakistani attack in the southern sector. The next day, Pakistan retaliated, initialising its air force to retaliate against Indian forces and air bases in both Kashmir and Punjab. India crossed the International Border (IB) on the Western front on September 6 (some officially claim this to be the beginning of the war). On September 6, the 15th Infantry Division of the Indian Army, under World War II veteran Major General Prasad battled a massive counterattack by Pakistan near the west bank of the Ichhogil Canal (BRB Canal), which was a de facto border of India and Pakistan. The General's entourage itself was ambushed and he was forced to flee his vehicle. A second, this time successful, attempt to cross over the Ichhogil Canal was made through the bridge in the village of Barki, just east of Lahore. This brought the Indian Army within the range of Lahore International Airport, and as result the United States requested a temporary ceasefire to allow it to evacuate its citizens in Lahore.
The same day, a counter offensive consisting of an armored division and infantry division supported by Pakistan Air Force Sabres rained down on the Indian 15th Division forcing it to withdraw to its starting point. On the days following September 9, both nations' premiere formations were routed in unequal battles. India's 1st Armored Division, labelled the "pride of the Indian Army", launched an offensive towards Sialkot. The Division divided itself into two prongs and came under heavy Pakistani tank fire at Taroah and was forced to withdraw. Similarly, Pakistan's pride, the 1st Armored Division, pushed an offensive towards Khemkaran with the intent to capture Amritsar (a major city in Punjab, India) and the bridge on River Beas to Jalandhar. The Pakistani 1st Armored Division never made it past Khem Karan and by the end of September 10 lay disintegrated under the defences of the Indian 4th Mountain Division at what is now known as the Battle of Asal Uttar (Real Answer). The area became known as 'Patton Nagar' (Patton Town) as Pakistan lost/abandoned nearly 100 tanks mostly Patton tanks obtained from the United States.
The war was heading for a stalemate, with both nations holding territory of the other. The Indian army suffered 3,000 battlefield deaths, while Pakistan suffered 3,800. The Indian army was in possession of 710 mile² (1,840 km²) of Pakistani territory and the Pakistan army held 210 mile² (545 km²) of Indian territory, mostly in Chumb in the northern sector.
Naval war
The navies of both India and Pakistan played no prominent role in the war of 1965. On September 7, a flotilla of the Pakistani Navy carried out a bombardment of the coastal Indian town and radar station of Dwarka under the name of Operation Dwarka, which was 200 miles (300 km) south of the Pakistani port of Karachi. There was no immediate retaliatory response from India. Later, the Indian fleet from Bombay sailed to Dwarka to patrol off that area to deter further bombardment.
According to Pakistani sources, one maiden submarine, PNS Ghazi allegedly kept the Indian Navy's aircraft carrier INS Vikrant besieged in Bombay throughout the war. Indian sources claim that it was not their intention to get into a naval conflict with Pakistan, but to restrict the war to a land-based conflict. Moreover, the ship was under refit in dry dock at that time and not even deployed.
Further south towards Bombay, there were reports of underwater attacks by the Indian Navy against what they suspected were American-supplied Pakistani submarines, but this was never confirmed.
Covert operations
A number of covert operations launched by the Pakistan Army to infiltrate Indian airbases and sabotage them. The SSG (Special Services Group) commandos were parachuted into enemy territory and, according to the then Chief of Army Staff General Musa Khan, about 135 commandos were airdropped at three airfields. Given that the Indian targets (Halwara, Pathankot and Adampur) were deep into enemy territory only 22 commandos made it back alive and the stealth operation proved ineffective. Of those remaining, 93 were taken prisoner, and 20 were killed in encounters with the army, police or the civilians The daring attempt proved to be an "unmitigated disaster" with one of the Commanders of the operations, Major Khalid Butt being taken Prisoner. The same Pakistani source claims that though this para-drop had failed in its mission, it had a serious impact on the planned Indian operations, 14 Indian Division was moving from Amritsar to Samba to take part in operations in conjunction with the Indian 1 Armoured Division, the Division was stopped on the road and was employed to hunt for paratroopers, the next morning the PAF found the road clogged with transport and inflicted a heavy toll.
Tank Battles
The 1965 war some of the largest scale Tank Battles since WW-II. The Pakistani Army had both numerical advantage in tanks as well as better equipment in the form of the venerable Patton Tank. They were however outclassed in the battlefield by Indian Tank Crew. Independant authors give the following accounts,
Main article: Quotes on Indo Pak Tank Battles Main article: Quotes of Pakistani ClaimsLosses
India and Pakistan hold widely divergent claims on the damage they have inflicted on each other and the amount of damage suffered by them. The following summarizes each nation's claims.
| Indian claims | Pakistani claims | Independent Sources | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casualties | - | - | 2763 Indian soldiers, 3800 Pakistani soldiers |
| Combat flying effort | 4073+ combat sorties | 2279 combat sorties | |
| Aircraft lost | 35 IAF (official), 73 PAF.Other sources based on the Official Indian Armed Forces History put actual IAF losses at 71 including 19 accidents (non combat sortie rate is not known) and PAF's combat losses alone at 43. | 19 PAF, 104 IAF | 20 PAF, Pakistan claims India rejected neutral arbitration., India retorts that the neutral arbitration by John Fricker was nothing but a commissioned work. (Singh, Pushpindar (1991). Fiza ya, Psyche of the Pakistan Air Force. Himalayan Books. ISBN 8170020387. ) |
| Aerial victories | 17 + 3 (post war) | 30 | - |
| Tanks destroyed | 128 Indian tanks , 152 Pakistani tanks captured, 150 Pakistani tanks destroyed | 165 Pakistan tank, ?? Indian tanks | 200 Pakistani tanks |
| Land area won | 1,500 mi (2,400 km) of Pakistani territory | 2,000 mi² (3,000 km²) of Indian territory | India held 710 mi² (1,840 km²) of Pakistani territory and Pakistan held 210 mi² (545 km²) of Indian territory |
There have been only a few neutral assessments of the damages of the war, some of the neutral assessments are mentioned below:-
- According to the United States Library of Congress Country Studies "The war was at the point of stalemate when the UN Security Council unanimously passed a resolution on September 20 that called for a cease-fire. New Delhi accepted the cease-fire resolution on September 21 and Islamabad on September 22, and the war ended on September 23. The Indian side lost 3,000 while the Pakistani side suffered 3,800 battlefield deaths."
Ceasefire
On September 22, the United Nations Security Council unanimously passed a resolution that called for an unconditional ceasefire from both nations. The war ended the following day. The Soviet Union, led by Premier Alexey Kosygin, brokered a ceasefire in Tashkent (now in Uzbekistan), where Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri and Pakistani President Ayub Khan signed an agreement to withdraw to pre-August lines no later than February 25,1966. The war remained largely inconclusive despite Pakistan suffering relatively more losses, and saw a six year period of relative peace between the two neighboring rivals before war broke out once again in 1971.
Intelligence failures
Indian miscalculations
Strategic miscalculations by both nations ensured that the result of this war remained a stalemate. The Indian Army failed to recognize the presence of heavy Pakistani artillery and armaments in Chumb and suffered significant losses as a result. The "Official History of the 1965 War", drafted by the Ministry of Defence of India in 1992 was a long suppressed document that outlined intelligence and strategic blunders by India during the war. According to the document, on September 22 when the Security Council was pressing for a ceasefire, the Indian Prime Minister asked the commanding Gen. Chaudhuri if India could possibly win the war, were he to hold off accepting the ceasefire for a while longer. The general replied that most of India's frontline ammunition had been used up and the Indian Army had suffered considerable tank loss.
It was found later that only 14% of India's frontline ammunition had been fired and India still held twice the number of tanks than Pakistan did. By this time, the Pakistani Army itself had used close to 80% of its ammunition. Air Chief Marshal (retd) P.C. Lal, who was the Vice Chief of Air Staff during the conflict, points to the lack of coordination between the IAF and the Indian army. Neither side revealed its battle plans to the other.The battle plans drafted by the Ministry of Defence and General Chaudhari, did not specify a role for the Indian Air Force in the order of battle. This attitude of Gen. Chaudhari was referred to by ACM Lal as the "Supremo Syndrome", a patronizing attitude sometimes attributed to the Indian army towards the other branches of the Indian Military.
Pakistani miscalculations
The Pakistani Army's failures started from the drawing board itself, with the supposition that a generally discontent Kashmiri people would rise to the occasion and revolt against their Indian rulers, bringing about a swift and decisive surrender of Kashmir. For whatever reason, the Kashmiri people did not revolt, and on the contrary provided the Indian Army with enough information for them to learn of "Operation Gibraltar" and the fact that the Army was battling not insurgents, as they had initially supposed, but Pakistani Army regulars. The Pakistani army failed to recognize that the Indian policy makers would attack the southern sector and open up the theater of conflict. Pakistan was forced to dedicate troops to the southern sector to protect Sialkot and Lahore instead of penetrating into Kashmir.
"Operation Grand Slam", which was launched by Pakistan to capture Akhnur, a town north-east of Jammu and a key region for communications between Kashmir and the rest of India, was also a failure. Many Pakistani critics have criticized the Ayub Khan administration for being indecisive during Operation Grand Slam. They claim that the operation failed because Ayub Khan knew the importance of Akhnur to India (having called it India's "jugular vein") and did not want to capture it and drive the two nations into an all out war. Despite progress made in Akhnur, General Ayub Khan for some inexplicable reason relieved the commanding Major General Akhtar Hussain Malik of charge and replaced him with Gen. Yahya Khan. A 24 hour lull ensued, which allowed the Indian army to regroup in Akhnur and oppose a lackluster attack headed by General Yahya Khan. "The enemy came to our rescue", asserted the Indian Chief of Staff of the Western Command. Many authors like Stephen Philip Cohen, have consistently viewed that Pakistan Army "acquired an exaggerated view of the weakness of both India and the Indian military... the 1965 war was a shock". As a result most of the blame was heaped on the leadership and little importance given to intelligence failures that persisted until the debacle of the 1971 war, when Pakistan was comprehensively defeated and dismembered by India, leading to the creation of Bangladesh.
sdf asdf asdf asdf asdf sd fasf asd f
See also
Further reading
- India-Pakistan war, 1965 Hari Ram Gupta
- Die to live: A selection of short stories based on the 1965 Indo-Pakistan war Muhammad Ismail Siddiqui.
- The war with Pakistan: A pictorial narration of the fifty days which rocked the sub-continent Dewan Berindranath
- First & Further reflections on the second Kashmir War (South Asia series) - 2 books by Louis Dupree.
- The India-Pakistan Air War of 1965 P.V.S.Jagan Mohan and Samir Chopra, Manohar Publishers
- War Dispatches Lt Gen Harbaksh Singh, Lancer International
- Indian Army after Independence Maj K C Praval, Lancer International
- Battle for Pakistan John Fricker, Ian Allan
- The Indo-Pakistan Conflict Russell Brines
- India Pakistan 1965 War : Role of Tanks Lt Col Bhupinder Singh, Publisher Unknown.
Notes
- Chris Bishop, "The Encyclopedia of 20th Century air warfare", 2001, Silverdale books
- Chris Bishop, "The Encyclopedia of 20th Century air warfare", 2001, Silverdale books
- Bhushan, Bharat. "Tulbul, Sir Creek and Siachen: Competitive Methodologies". South Asian Journal. March 2005, Encyclopedia Britannica and Open Forum - UNIDIR
- ^ http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/indo-pak_1965.htm "Indo-Pakistan War of 1965"]. Globalsecurity.com. Cite error: The named reference "globalsecurity" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- Amin, Agha Humayun. Maj (Retd). "Grand Slam — A Battle of Lost Opportunities". Defence Journal. Sept 2000
- ^ "The Lahore Offensive". Storyofpakistan.com. 1 Jun. 2003
- Chakravorty, BC. "The Indo-Pak War, 1965". History Division, Ministry of Defence. Government of India. 1992
- ^ http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0189) "A Country Study: India"]. Library of Congress. Government of the United States. Sep 1995
- ^ Defence Journal : SSG in the 1965 War http://www.defencejournal.com/july98/1965war.htm
- Pak Def - SSG Regiment http://www.pakdef.info/pakmilitary/army/regiments/ssg.html
- Defence Journal : The Way it was http://www.defencejournal.com/may98/thewayitwas1.htm
- http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/1965War/Chapter10.html
- http://www.defencejournal.com/2000/sept/grand-slam.htm
- onwar
- Bharat-Rakshak.com http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/Misc/Loss1965.html
- Official History of IAF in 65 War http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Army/History/1965War/PDF/1965Chapter09.pdf
- John Fricker an Englisman writing a book about the war http://www.chowk.com/show_article.cgi?aid=00001093&channel=civic%20center
- ^ http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Army/Patton2.html
Sources and external links
- Mohammed Musa Khan (1983). My Version: India-Pakistan War 1965. Wajidalis.
- United States Library of Congress Country Studies - India
- Official History of the Indian Armed Forces in the 1965 War with Pakistan
- Story of Pakistan
- GlobalSecurity.org Indo-Pakistan War 1965
- Pakistan Columnist AH Amin analyzes the war.
- Grand Slam - A Battle of lost Opportunities, Maj (Retd) Agha Humayun Amin — very detailed roll of events and analysis
- A Critical Look at the 1965 Operations, Air Chief Marshall (retd) PC Lal — dispassionate analysis
- The India-Pakistan War, 1965: 40 Years On - From Rediff.com
- Lessons of the 1965 War from Daily Times (Pakistan)
- Pak Army's Kargil like disaster of 1965 - South Asia Tribune
- Spirit of ’65 & the parallels with today - Ayaz Amir