| Revision as of 22:41, 19 September 2006 editAlphachimp (talk | contribs)29,194 editsm blocked header← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:02, 19 September 2006 edit undoThe Hungry Hun (talk | contribs)115 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| || You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | || You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | ||
| |}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 16 hours. are the reverts in question. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)</div> | |}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 16 hours. are the reverts in question. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)</div> | ||
| {{unblock|Actually, I did ''not'' violate 3RR but merely de-vandalized the article and consider this covered by the according exemption to the 3RR rule; if you unblock me, I'd like to prove this by pointing out the relevant article and discussion parts. I'm positively sure that this block is ungrounded and that I can prove it conclusively if given the opportunity. Thanks, ] 23:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)<br>''If I understand it correctly, I'm supposed to paste the contents of the blocking template here - I can't seem to figure out how & would be grateful for a hint.''}} | |||
Revision as of 23:02, 19 September 2006
3RR violation WARNING for Muhammad article
You have already violate 3RR. Be aware that you could be banned if you continue to do that. Hence stop reverting -- ابراهيم 22:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
The picture in Muhammad article
The picture in Muhammad article is not related to conquest of Mecca at all. The incident happened even before Muhammad was a Prophet and Mecca is conquest decades after that. Tell me why you want to add picture when you have no idea that what that picture is about??? Btw I have reported you as you have done enough reverts. --- ابراهيم 22:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Blocked-3RR Violation
 |
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. |
The Hungry Hun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Actually, I did not violate 3RR but merely de-vandalized the article and consider this covered by the according exemption to the 3RR rule; if you unblock me, I'd like to prove this by pointing out the relevant article and discussion parts. I'm positively sure that this block is ungrounded and that I can prove it conclusively if given the opportunity. Thanks, The Hungry Hun 23:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)If I understand it correctly, I'm supposed to paste the contents of the blocking template here - I can't seem to figure out how & would be grateful for a hint.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Actually, I did ''not'' violate 3RR but merely de-vandalized the article and consider this covered by the according exemption to the 3RR rule; if you unblock me, I'd like to prove this by pointing out the relevant article and discussion parts. I'm positively sure that this block is ungrounded and that I can prove it conclusively if given the opportunity. Thanks, ] 23:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)<br>''If I understand it correctly, I'm supposed to paste the contents of the blocking template here - I can't seem to figure out how & would be grateful for a hint.'' |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Actually, I did ''not'' violate 3RR but merely de-vandalized the article and consider this covered by the according exemption to the 3RR rule; if you unblock me, I'd like to prove this by pointing out the relevant article and discussion parts. I'm positively sure that this block is ungrounded and that I can prove it conclusively if given the opportunity. Thanks, ] 23:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)<br>''If I understand it correctly, I'm supposed to paste the contents of the blocking template here - I can't seem to figure out how & would be grateful for a hint.'' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Actually, I did ''not'' violate 3RR but merely de-vandalized the article and consider this covered by the according exemption to the 3RR rule; if you unblock me, I'd like to prove this by pointing out the relevant article and discussion parts. I'm positively sure that this block is ungrounded and that I can prove it conclusively if given the opportunity. Thanks, ] 23:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)<br>''If I understand it correctly, I'm supposed to paste the contents of the blocking template here - I can't seem to figure out how & would be grateful for a hint.'' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}