Misplaced Pages

User talk:The Diaz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:30, 3 April 2017 editNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,477 edits Please self-revert: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 15:21, 3 April 2017 edit undoNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,477 edits Arbitration enforcement request: new sectionNext edit →
Line 125: Line 125:


As the header for ] notes, edits that are challenged by reversion must not be reinstated without clear consensus on the article talk page. No such consensus exists for your edit, which I challenged by reversion, and in fact you haven't even attempted to engage in the talk page in any way, shape or form. If you do not self-revert and begin discussing your proposed change, I will request that ] be imposed upon you. ] (]) 05:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC) As the header for ] notes, edits that are challenged by reversion must not be reinstated without clear consensus on the article talk page. No such consensus exists for your edit, which I challenged by reversion, and in fact you haven't even attempted to engage in the talk page in any way, shape or form. If you do not self-revert and begin discussing your proposed change, I will request that ] be imposed upon you. ] (]) 05:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

== Arbitration enforcement request ==

Because you have refused to self-revert, I have been forced to open a against you. I would ask again that you self-revert and engage in discussion, and save us the trouble of doing this. ] (]) 15:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:21, 3 April 2017

Welcome!

Hello, TheBD2000! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Misplaced Pages, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

3RR

You've made four reverts at . Please see WP:3RR.

I would also appreciate it if you refrained from calling my edits "disruptive" in the future.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

You have now made five reverts. Please self revert your latest move.Volunteer Marek (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

That was not a revert and there was nothing wrong with my edit. Deal with it, Volunteer Marek. TheBD2000 (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes it was. You moved text that has been under dispute. And that's AFTER already making four reverts, and that's AFTER already being notified.Volunteer Marek (talk) 14:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Richard Saucedo

Hi, I'm PamD. TheBD2000, thanks for creating Richard Saucedo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand this one-sentence stub: the source you have given gives plenty to work from. Really "X is an American composer" is not adequate for an encyclopedia article - but it's a start, thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

PamD 09:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

PamD, I made it simple so it could be translated from the Dutch article already on Dutch Misplaced Pages. Following the directions of WP:TRANSLATETOHERE. TheBD2000 (talk) 12:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but that includes the wording articles must meet the relevant notability criteria for the English-language Misplaced Pages – foreign-language Wikipedias may have differing standards, and the acceptance of an article in one language is no guarantee that it will be accepted in another. I think you need to expand the single sentence enough to show us that he's likely to be considered notable. PamD 15:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Volunteer Marek (talk) 14:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 --NeilN 14:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

You are risking a block

See Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TheBD2000 reported by User:Volunteer Marek (Result: ). It appears that you broke WP:3RR. You might be able to avoid a block if you will respond on the noticeboard and agree to stop warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Reversion of Hawaii

I reverted your edit to Hawaii because it created a problem with the display of {{Infobox U.S. state}}. Please try Show Preview before saving. Peaceray (talk) 05:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Quebec City mosque shooting conspiracy theories for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quebec City mosque shooting conspiracy theories is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Quebec City mosque shooting conspiracy theories until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  {MordeKyle}   19:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Please self-revert

As the header for Protests against Donald Trump notes, edits that are challenged by reversion must not be reinstated without clear consensus on the article talk page. No such consensus exists for your edit, which I challenged by reversion, and in fact you haven't even attempted to engage in the talk page in any way, shape or form. If you do not self-revert and begin discussing your proposed change, I will request that arbitration enforcement sanctions be imposed upon you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement request

Because you have refused to self-revert, I have been forced to open a request for enforcement against you. I would ask again that you self-revert and engage in discussion, and save us the trouble of doing this. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)