Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:24, 23 April 2017

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. California Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Trains: Rapid transit / Streetcars High‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit. This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Buses Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

General Motors streetcar conspiracy received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article was nominated for deletion on May 1 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Non neutral

Springee attempted to remove the non-neutral tag. There is no improvement in the tone of the article. It continues to suffer from the years of overt ownership of Anmccaff. Undoing any of this non-neutral content has proven impossible vs his overwhelming forcefulness. His obnoxious might does not make it right. Trackinfo (talk) 04:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

OK, I didn't realize this was still an active issue. Thanks for adding the talk page comment. Springee (talk) 04:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

• This page has over 50 sections and is tl;dr. Can someone please succinctly explain why there is a neutrality tag on this article? It is not normal for such a tag to be on an article for two years. Coretheapple (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

• I would second this. I have respect for all the parties involved (and have been involved myself). However, I've also been out of the loop long enough on this article to no longer recall what the issues were. Could we restart the process and try to sort things out a bit? Two years is a long time for a neutrality tag. Springee (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

• Here is where the article was before Anmccaff got involved. I assume the subsequent edit that originally added the POV tag was him as an IP. In the subsequent 1,000 or so edits, most of the content in this article was reversed, previous sources removed and discounted (called discredited or debunked by Anmccaff). His POV has taken over the article. Any efforts to correct or add sources that do not agree with his POV have been rebuffed. It is an overwhelming task to try to begin the rewrite, made impossible when each step is reverted, with a lengthy, disjointed diatribe associated with each attempt. Here is but one example of my own attempt to start. Squashed from the word go. WP:OWN. Previous editors, including myself, have given up the effort. A few subsequent editors have cleaned up Anmccaff's poor editing style technically and have made minor revisions to his phrasing, but the essence of the content comes exclusively from the forceful opinion of Anmccaff. The lawyer like intimacy of his knowledge of this subject and his work to whitewash the record of the convicted conspirators, strongly suggests to me a WP:COI situation, but of course I couldn't prove it. It is an ironic twist that the POV tag was added at the beginning of his devolvement of the previous version of the article. Now that the article totally reflects his POV, the tag is quite deserved. Trackinfo (talk) 05:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Schramm excerpts.

The web piece on Detroit appears to be a fairly faithful excerpting of published work; should it really be called "self published", or should it be seen as a convenience site for a less-available print source? Anmccaff (talk) 17:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy is not a "self-published source"

Don't confuse a convenience cite with the material referenced. Anmccaff (talk) 18:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Sourcing

Book-length sources listed in "Further reading" not used in body of article

• Bottles, Scott L (1987). Los Angeles and the Automobile. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05795-3.
• Black, Edwin (2006). "10". Internal Combustion: How Corporations and Governments Addicted the World to Oil and Derailed the Alternatives. St. Martins Press.
• Goddard, Stephen B. (1994). Getting There: The Epic Struggle between Road and Rail in the American Century. Basic Books.
• Hanson, S. and Giuliano, G. editors (2004). The Geography of Urban Transportation, Third Edition. The Guilford Press. ISBN 1-59385-055-7. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Fellmeth Robert (1973). Politics of land: Ralph Nader's study group report on land use in California. Grossman Publishers. pp. 410–414, 488. ISBN 0-670-56326-9.
• Hilton, George W; Due, John F (1960). The Electric Interurban Railways in America. Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-4014-3.
• Kunstler, James Howard (1994). The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's Man-Made Landscape. Free Press. ISBN 0-671-88825-0.
• Lewis, John E. The Mammoth Book of Conspiracies. Constable & Robinson Ltd. pp. 152–62.
• Norton, Peter D. (2008). Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-14100-0.
• Thompson, Gregory Lee (1993). The Passenger Train in the Motor Age: California's Rail and Bus Industries, 1910–1941. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH. ISBN 0-8142-0609-3.

Journal articles listed in "Further reading" not used in body of article

• Adler, Sy (1991). The Transformation of the Pacific Electric Railway: Bradford Snell, Roger Rabbit, and the Politics of Transportation in Los Angeles. Vol. 27. Urban Affairs Quarterly.
• Fischel, W.A (2004). An Economic History of Zoning and a Cure for its Exclusionary Effects. Vol. 41. pp. 317–40. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)

Individuals identified as topic experts in the lead not used in body of article

1. Scott Bottles
2. Sy Adler
3. Jonathan Richmond

Top-cited source

Meanwhile, the most frequently cited source in this article is a non-peer-reviewed, self-published PDF from a former academic currently a licensed cosmetician and sole proprietress of La Bellissima Expert Lash & Brow in Portland, Oregon:

Bianco, Martha (1998). "Kennedy, 60 Minutes, and Roger Rabbit: Understanding Conspiracy-Theory Explanations of The Decline of Urban Mass Transit" (pdf). pp. 98–110. Retrieved 2008-09-23. {{cite web}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Statements attributed:

1. "By 1930 most streetcar systems were aging and losing money. Service to the public was suffering; the Great Depression compounded this. Yellow Coach tried to persuade transit companies to replace streetcars with buses, but could not convince the power companies that owned the streetcar operations to motorize."
2. "GM decided to form a new subsidiary—United Cities Motor Transport (UCMT)—to finance the conversion of streetcar systems to buses in small cities. The new subsidiary made investments in small transit systems, in Kalamazoo and Saginaw, Michigan and in Springfield, Ohio where they were successful in conversion to buses."
3. "...was reorganized "for the purpose of taking over the controlling interest in certain operating companies engaged in city bus transportation and overland bus transportation" with loans from the suppliers and manufacturers."
4. "In 1939 Roy Fitzgerald, president of NCL, approached Yellow Coach Manufacturing, requesting additional financing for expansion..."
5. "...and the 1940s, raised funds for expansion from Firestone Tire, Federal Engineering, a subsidiary of Standard Oil of California (now Chevron Corporation), Phillips Petroleum (now part of ConocoPhillips), GM, Mack Trucks (now a subsidiary of Volvo)."
6. "Adding to the confusion, Snell had already joined the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly as a staff member."
7. "The 1988 film Who Framed Roger Rabbit, vectors the folktale about the decline of the Pacific Electric."

52.56.109.198 (talk) 18:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

erm.....so? Ms. Bianco made a career change; how would that invalidate her past work? Despite your frequent labeling of her work as "self-published" it was clearly written ex officio. Anmccaff (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

• IP editor (HughD?), it would be best if you would create an account or use your existing account before making such extensive edits to the article. Springee (talk) 14:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Self-published websites used as sources for statements in Misplaced Pages voice

Despite the generous availability of reliable secondary and tertiary sources, as yet unused in this article, this article relies on self-published websites of transportation and history enthusiasts:

1. http://www.coachbuilt.com/
2. http://www.historyisaweapon.com/
3. http://www.detroittransithistory.info/
4. https://www.yumpu.com/
5. http://utahrails.net/
6. http://marthabianco.com/
7. http://www.1134.org/

52.56.111.224 (talk) 16:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Strack is -the- historian for certain aspects of Utah rail, and is reliably published.

Bianco is also reliably published; her own site is used for the reader's convenience.

Detroit transit is, as mentioned before, a convenience cite for published work.

The Yumpu piece is usable to document a particular view, I suppose, but it'd be nicer if it had an author and an original source.

Coachbuilt has been found reliable for its own work on several occasions, and is only being used as a convenience cite.

1134 speaks for itself.

Historyisaweapon is also being used as a convenience cite.

Convenience links are an accepted practice for access to material otherwise difficult for readers and researchers to get to. Anmccaff (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Misplaced Pages. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. See Misplaced Pages's guide to writing better articles for suggestions. (January 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

IP Guy, would you care to give an example or three? Anmccaff (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Recent revert without discussion.

Monopoly31121993, A "summary" should not change the meaning of the article, or misrepresent the sources. BRD...I haven't seen you addressing your desired changes here on talk, have I? Anmccaff (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

The introduction should only re-state what is already in the article. It is not he right place for listing every city in the U.S. with or without streetcars. It needs to be cut down and summarize the main points of the article.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 15:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• C-Class California articles
• Mid-importance California articles
• WikiProject California articles
• C-Class rail transport articles
• High-importance rail transport articles
• C-Class Rapid transit articles
• Unknown-importance Rapid transit articles
• WikiProject Rapid transit articles
• C-Class Streetcars articles
• Unknown-importance Streetcars articles
• WikiProject Streetcars articles
• All WikiProject Trains pages
• C-Class bus transport articles
• Mid-importance bus transport articles
• WikiProject Buses articles
• C-Class politics articles
• Mid-importance politics articles
• WikiProject Politics articles
• C-Class WikiProject Business articles
• Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
• WikiProject Business articles
• Old requests for peer review