Misplaced Pages

User talk:Grafikm fr: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:25, 26 September 2006 editKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits please help← Previous edit Revision as of 02:27, 26 September 2006 edit undoKirill Lokshin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users75,365 edits September newsletterNext edit →
Line 184: Line 184:
== Please help == == Please help ==
Sorry to bother you, but as an ] things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion ]. ] 02:25, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Sorry to bother you, but as an ] things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion ]. ] 02:25, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

== September newsletter ==

]. Assuming you don't notice anything horribly wrong with it, the bot can probably send it out. Thanks! ] 02:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:27, 26 September 2006

Home

Talkpage

Sandbox

Contributions

To do list

Stats

Email

Please leave a new message.

Archives: (Feb-May '06) (Jun-Jul '06) (Aug '06)


Novels newsletter

Thanks for doing that - nearly perfect - I did notice the user:Grey Shadow only got the link version rather than his requested "Full version". Small matter but I thought you might like to know. Thanks again. :: Kevinalewis : /(Desk) 13:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 5th.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 36 5 September 2006 About the Signpost

Everyking desysopped Explicit images spark debate
Report from the Italian Misplaced Pages The English Misplaced Pages reaches 1,000 administrators
Voting begins in Board elections Misplaced Pages in the news
News and notes Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Ghirlandajo

I am glad to see you say that you have advised Ghirlandajo on his behavior before. It seems to me that we agree there is a problem but we merely disagree as to the solution.

I do grant you that Ghirlandajo has toned it down recently. I was pleasantly surprised to find that there were not as many incidents in the last month or two as I had expected.

Certainly it would be best for everyone if Ghirlandajo would take advice from his friends such as you. But now the ArbCom case has already been filed. Currently I feel a little warning from ArbCom may help motivate Ghirlandajo. However, if you feel threats would only alienate Ghirlandajo I am prepared to be convinced.

I feel the most important thing is to get Ghirlandajo to talk about it and acknowledge there is a problem. We simply can't make any progress if he feels we have no right to complain.

I do understand that Ghirlandajo is a major asset to Misplaced Pages and we would suffer immensely if he left. But if we can't discuss our differences then we can't work together.

I'm asking you, no I'm begging you, to help establish a dialogue with Ghirlandajo. Help him understand that Cowman, or I, or someone else who understands the issues, does not have to be an enemy. (watchlisted you) --Ideogram 14:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The problem appears to have solved itself. Thank you for whatever you did or didn't do. --Ideogram 07:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please explain

What does "procès d'intention" mean? --Ideogram 10:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

When you are back

When you are back please see Talk:Second_Rzhev-Sychevka_Offensive#copyvio? --Philip Baird Shearer 23:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Good luck

On break? Well, that explains things! ;-)

In any case, good luck with the exams! Kirill Lokshin 01:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 11th.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 37 11 September 2006 About the Signpost

Carnildo resysopped Report from the Hungarian Misplaced Pages
News and notes Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 18th.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 38 18 September 2006 About the Signpost

"Citizendium" project aims to rival Misplaced Pages Report from the Simple English Misplaced Pages
News and notes In the news
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

My plugin

Hi. I see in recent changes that you're using my plugin. A couple of points:

  • You need to change your edit summary, as it currently says "clean up" (the AWB default) :) Change it to something short and sweet like "Bot". Unfortunately AWB insists that the edit summary box contain something otherwise I'd do it all programatically!
  • In the last few minutes I released a new version which will remove importance= parameters from MILHIST templates. It's no big deal but you might want to grab that version, up to you.

--kingboyk 22:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

PD Soviet pictures et al

Are you back? It seems one of these German deletionists is opening a second front: . That is the same guy who is currently trying to get the Reichstag picture deleted on Commons:. Funnily, he is invoking the fact that there is no panorama freedom in France (). Personally, I think that since these statues are government property on a government site, there is no reason here to even invoke panorama freedom. So, like with the Reichstag flag picture they are mixing up German law with the law of the country of origin to construct a possible copyright infringement. But I do not know French copyright law. If you are also active on French Wikipdia, do you know anyone there who knows the French law so that , if this is indeed a new bout of lunacy, it can be stopped? --Pan Gerwazy 22:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Adzhimushkay

Meh, names don't always make sense. ;-)

"Quarry" (or perhaps "quarries") is a more accurate translation of the Russian name, and hence seem to be the one more commonly used in English; I'm sort of hesitant to simply make something up just because it seems more sensible. (Not to mention that "catacombs" has a somewhat different sense in English than it does in Russian.) In any case, though, I'll leave the choice of name up to your discretion. Kirill Lokshin 18:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

100th Guards Rifle Division

Any input here would be highly appreciated; we don't know quite what to do with this thing. ;-) Kirill Lokshin 19:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

In all fairness

It's absolutely true that Tony Sidaway did make this edit calling another editor something unprintable, but four minutes later he removed it as "not helpful". I wonder if it might be better to withdraw that from the page rather than draw attention to it? David | Talk 21:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Please help

Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:25, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

September newsletter

Is ready. Assuming you don't notice anything horribly wrong with it, the bot can probably send it out. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 02:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Category: