| Revision as of 17:53, 17 May 2017 editGliderMaven (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,503 edits →WannaCry: I appreciate it← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:34, 17 May 2017 edit undoAnarchyte (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators41,858 edits →WannaCry: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :Yeah, thanks, I appreciate it. That was a bit dodgy- it's rarely worth trying to circumvent the process like that. Mergers usually run for at least several days, but 6 hours and four votes were way, way too short. While investigating it, I found that WP:SNOW is not actually policy, it's only an essay. Anyway, I'm pleasantly surprised how the !vote is turning out, I was somewhat reluctant to undo it, it could well have snowed anyway.] (]) 17:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC) | :Yeah, thanks, I appreciate it. That was a bit dodgy- it's rarely worth trying to circumvent the process like that. Mergers usually run for at least several days, but 6 hours and four votes were way, way too short. While investigating it, I found that WP:SNOW is not actually policy, it's only an essay. Anyway, I'm pleasantly surprised how the !vote is turning out, I was somewhat reluctant to undo it, it could well have snowed anyway.] (]) 17:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ::I completely agree that the closure was a tad off, I just assumed that if within 6 hours it had only received opposes, there was no chance it was going to end any other way, though I'm glad to have been proved wrong; in fact, I've supported the proposal. Have a nice day. Cheers, '''<font face="Papyrus">] <font color="#000"><small>(] | ])</small></font></font>''' 23:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:34, 17 May 2017
May 14 ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
See my contributions page. 73.61.20.253 (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
WannaCry
Hey, just wanted to apologise directly for the invalid closure. I've left my opinions on the merge there instead, now. Hope you have a great day! Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks, I appreciate it. That was a bit dodgy- it's rarely worth trying to circumvent the process like that. Mergers usually run for at least several days, but 6 hours and four votes were way, way too short. While investigating it, I found that WP:SNOW is not actually policy, it's only an essay. Anyway, I'm pleasantly surprised how the !vote is turning out, I was somewhat reluctant to undo it, it could well have snowed anyway.GliderMaven (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- I completely agree that the closure was a tad off, I just assumed that if within 6 hours it had only received opposes, there was no chance it was going to end any other way, though I'm glad to have been proved wrong; in fact, I've supported the proposal. Have a nice day. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)