| Revision as of 10:25, 2 October 2006 editDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 edits archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:28, 2 October 2006 edit undoHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits Thanks for clarificationNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| == Thanks for clarification == | |||
| Thanks for clarifying your position concerning my RFCU. Regarding Elst, I wil discuss that later as I have my hands full trying to fix up the ] and related articles right now. Thanks again.] 10:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:28, 2 October 2006
| Campaign for less bull more writing |
| I believe all editors should make a significant contribution to at least one featured article before being considered for adminship, and should make a significant contribution to at least one featured article (or single-handedly write a Good Article) per year or stand for re-election to retain their status. People interested in administrative tasks but not in writing content should be offered a separate status such as rollback privileges without blocking privileges. Checkuser and bureaucrat positions should be scheduled to expire and be rotated among trusted admins. |
| We are here to write an encyclopedia |
As a result of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Rajput (closed February 2006), my Misplaced Pages account is exposed to occasional outbursts of trolling by throwaway accounts. For this reason I decided to semi-protect my talkpage. If you are editing logged out or with a young account and you came here to make a good faith comment, please try to get my attention on the pertinent article's talkpage, or consider maturing your account with a few more edits first. If you came here because you were told to, or because you read allegations about my position on India related topics or Rajputs in particular, on-wiki or off-wiki, do make sure you are familiar with the history and context of the case before asking me to explain further. I will only be prepared to discuss recent developments and not repeat my position on the events of the Rajput case of winter 05/06. For my basic position towards any sort of ethnic or cultural supremacism, see . dab (ᛏ) 09:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
archive1: 19:40, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC) – 18:26, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) / 2: – 04:10, 25 Nov 04 / 3: – 08:23, 19 Dec 04 / 4: – 09:31, 11 Jan 05 / 5: – 2:05, 8 Mar 05 / 6: – 09:17, 6 May 05 / 7: – 09:15, 1 Jul 05 / 8: – 08:17, 12 Aug 05 / 9: – 09:27, 7 Nov 05 / A: – 19:40, 13 Dec 05 / B: – 02:04, 16 Jan 06 C: – 20:47, 22 Feb 06 / D: – 22:26, 21 March 06 / E: – 05:54, 19 May 06 / F: – 06:07, 5 Jul 06 / 10 – 13:16, 9 Aug 06 / 11: – 15:58, 9 Sep 06 / 12: – 09:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for clarification
Thanks for clarifying your position concerning my RFCU. Regarding Elst, I wil discuss that later as I have my hands full trying to fix up the Muhammad bin Qasim and related articles right now. Thanks again.Hkelkar 10:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)