| Revision as of 03:54, 14 July 2017 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,142,123 edits →New Page Reviewer Newsletter: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 14 July 2017 edit undoCock 'n Balls (talk | contribs)51 edits →Blocks are preventative, not punitive.: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:TonyBallioni@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=790482298 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:TonyBallioni@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=790482298 --> | ||
| == Blocks are preventative, not punitive. == | |||
| Blocks are preventative, not punitive. | |||
Revision as of 04:27, 14 July 2017
MfD nomination of Draft:Gamergate controversy
Draft:Gamergate controversy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Gamergate controversy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Gamergate controversy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 03:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Vandalising CNN controversies pages
Please, stop
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at CNN controversies. --DraKyry (talk) 07:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "CNN blackmail controversy". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 13 July 2017.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 08:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning CNN blackmail controversy, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello NorthBySouthBaranof, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
- Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
Technology update:
- Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Misplaced Pages:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
- The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Misplaced Pages
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through
General project update:
- Following discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Misplaced Pages:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Misplaced Pages talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Blocks are preventative, not punitive.
Blocks are preventative, not punitive.