Misplaced Pages

Talk:E-gold: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:14, 14 July 2017 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,800 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:E-gold/Archives/2014. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 15:08, 10 August 2017 edit undo172.58.99.221 (talk) →Financial Cryptography sourcesTag: review editNext edit →
Line 78: Line 78:


--] (]) 19:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC) --] (]) 19:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Not only are they wrong, but that site has an angle against bitcoin. They are promoting alternative currency systems. Typical.


== Neutrality == == Neutrality ==

Revision as of 15:08, 10 August 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the E-gold article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBusiness Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconNumismatics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 34 external links on E-gold. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 04:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on E-gold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Financial Cryptography sources

I think this might be original research, but it seems clear to me that these two Financial Cryptography sources have been proven wrong:

  • Exchanges were regulated an legitimized, and you can trade person-to-person without any centralized exchange. Botnets became irrelevant when FPGAs (and later ASICs) dominated the mining market.
  • Although it continues to have bubbles, it's tending to stabilize overall. Theft has since been vastly reduced with multisignature transactions and hardware wallets (like the Trezor).

--104.129.198.101 (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Not only are they wrong, but that site has an angle against bitcoin. They are promoting alternative currency systems. Typical.

Neutrality

This reads like an apologia, there's excuses all through and "but banks are bad too!" Needs a cleanup - David Gerard (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Categories: