| Revision as of 23:36, 14 July 2017 editNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,477 edits →FYI← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:45, 15 July 2017 edit undoJorm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers7,773 edits →So: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| Your recent edit may not have included the best example in light of: . ] (]) 23:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC) | Your recent edit may not have included the best example in light of: . ] (]) 23:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :It doesn't appear to merit ''any'' mention in the main biography, though - which I presume was a consensus editorial decision at some point, that I entirely agree with. If we don't discuss, in Trump's biography, wrong things that he has tweeted because it's too trivial to mention, it's probably too trivial to mention in the brief biography of a far less prominent person. ] (]) 23:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC) | :It doesn't appear to merit ''any'' mention in the main biography, though - which I presume was a consensus editorial decision at some point, that I entirely agree with. If we don't discuss, in Trump's biography, wrong things that he has tweeted because it's too trivial to mention, it's probably too trivial to mention in the brief biography of a far less prominent person. ] (]) 23:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == So == | |||
| --] (]) 02:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:45, 15 July 2017
Vandalising CNN controversies pages
Please, stop
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at CNN controversies. --DraKyry (talk) 07:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "CNN blackmail controversy". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 13 July 2017.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 08:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning CNN blackmail controversy, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello NorthBySouthBaranof, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
- Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
Technology update:
- Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Misplaced Pages:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
- The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Misplaced Pages
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through
General project update:
- Following discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Misplaced Pages:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Misplaced Pages talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
FYI
Your recent edit may not have included the best example in light of: . CIreland (talk) 23:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't appear to merit any mention in the main biography, though - which I presume was a consensus editorial decision at some point, that I entirely agree with. If we don't discuss, in Trump's biography, wrong things that he has tweeted because it's too trivial to mention, it's probably too trivial to mention in the brief biography of a far less prominent person. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
So
This is how Guy "doesn't care" anymore.--Jorm (talk) 02:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)