| Revision as of 15:46, 4 October 2006 editRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits q.v.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:19, 5 October 2006 edit undoRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits →Oh noes!: respNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| You appear to be in violation of the very important official rule known as RFA Cliche #1. Would you like some help in remedying that? ] 15:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | You appear to be in violation of the very important official rule known as RFA Cliche #1. Would you like some help in remedying that? ] 15:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *<grin> I meant ]. ] 15:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | *<grin> I meant ]. ] 15:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **Indeed, my point was that while you're not an admin, you do behave like one, and hence my offer to nominate you. I do not believe adminship is (or should be) limited to vandal fighters; rather, anyone with reasonable experience and judgment could be one. Indeed, the three basic questions are (1) what are you going to work on (policy sounds like a reasonable answer); (2) what part of your earlier work are you proud of; and (3) how did you handle yourself in conflict (it is nearly inevitable to have been in conflict, and I've seen people who consider a lack of any conflict a lack of experience). For reference, I had done zero vandal fighting before I was adminned, and very little since. | |||
| **Anyway of course the decision is yours; but you would be a valuable addition to the mop mob, and your chances are better than you estimate. Yours, ] 16:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:19, 5 October 2006
Communications in Dutch: please see User talk:Francis Schonken/Dutch
Overleg in het nederlands: op User talk:Francis Schonken/Dutch a.u.b.
Victionarium → User talk:Francis Schonken/Latinus
Archives: Archive 01 - Archive 02
Oh noes!
You appear to be in violation of the very important official rule known as RFA Cliche #1. Would you like some help in remedying that? >Radiant< 15:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- <grin> I meant this. >Radiant< 15:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed, my point was that while you're not an admin, you do behave like one, and hence my offer to nominate you. I do not believe adminship is (or should be) limited to vandal fighters; rather, anyone with reasonable experience and judgment could be one. Indeed, the three basic questions are (1) what are you going to work on (policy sounds like a reasonable answer); (2) what part of your earlier work are you proud of; and (3) how did you handle yourself in conflict (it is nearly inevitable to have been in conflict, and I've seen people who consider a lack of any conflict a lack of experience). For reference, I had done zero vandal fighting before I was adminned, and very little since.
- Anyway of course the decision is yours; but you would be a valuable addition to the mop mob, and your chances are better than you estimate. Yours, >Radiant< 16:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)