Revision as of 09:01, 15 September 2004 editFormeruser-81 (talk | contribs)22,309 edits →Edit Summaries← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:36, 29 November 2004 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==Eurasian Land Bridge== | ==Eurasian Land Bridge== | ||
Please cease your reversions at ] as they violate the ArbCom decision in the Lyndon LaRouche case re Original Research: See ] 09:01, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | Please cease your reversions at ] as they violate the ArbCom decision in the Lyndon LaRouche case re Original Research: See ] 09:01, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | ||
==Sockpuppet?== | |||
Weed Harper, I found what appears to be some posts of yours on Usenet, and they were sent from IP address 64.30.208.48, which was recently blocked from Misplaced Pages for posting unverifiable LaRouche material. Have you been posting to Misplaced Pages using ] as a sockpuppet? The same IP address, which belongs to Link Line Communications, has been reported for sending pro-LaRouche spam around the Web. I'm posting below one of the Usenet posts I found. | |||
I'd appreciate your comments. I don't mind debating with genuine editors, but it gets a bit much when the same editor is sending out multiple posts with different user names. ] 07:36, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC) | |||
From: weed_harper@bigheavyworld.com (Weed Harper) | |||
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.guitar | |||
Subject: Re: What was the "standard pitch" of the guitar at the time of Tarrega? | |||
Date: 25 Jan 2004 13:13:27 -0800 | |||
Organization: http://groups.google.com | |||
Lines: 16 | |||
Message-ID: <4db933f4.0401251313.25f577c6@posting.google.com> | |||
References: <2c3925ab.0401190723.2796baae@posting.google.com> <pn2o00lkjebrk1539521tcqvkupl56iodn@4ax.com> <400c539d.2730541@news.compuserve.com> <mp7o00lbpqtvhaqntqj9n3sfm0cgtmk2vd@4ax.com> <2c3925ab.0401192314.3892e930@posting.google.com> <A5cPb.21229$Mb7.770@lakeread04> <7d424f23.0401201323.a9b32f1@posting.google.com> | |||
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.30.208.48 | |||
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 | |||
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit | |||
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1075065207 29272 127.0.0.1 (25 Jan 2004 21:13:27 GMT) | |||
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com | |||
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:13:27 +0000 (UTC) | |||
> "Evan Pyle" <enpyle@cox.net> wrote in message news:<A5cPb.21229$Mb7.770@lakeread04>... | |||
> > I contacted this Schiller Institute because of my interest in their push in | |||
> > reestablishing A=432. | |||
> > Big mistake. | |||
> > They are an arm of Lyndon Larouche's organization. His people hounded me | |||
> > mercilessly, trying to "evangelize" me to their political positions. | |||
> > That is fucking hilarious! Why do the Larouchies care about | |||
> 432? Is it part of their "Queen deals dope" world conspiracy | |||
> theory or what? I will have to look in on these guys. I can't | |||
> resist a good conspiracy theory. | |||
I can't either, but for my money, nothing beats the "Osama did September 11" theory. |
Revision as of 07:36, 29 November 2004
Welcome to the Misplaced Pages
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Misplaced Pages:Tutorial
- Misplaced Pages:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Misplaced Pages:Policy Library
- Misplaced Pages:Utilities
- Misplaced Pages:Cite your sources
- Misplaced Pages:Verifiability
- Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette
- Misplaced Pages:Civility
- Misplaced Pages:Conflict resolution
- Misplaced Pages:Brilliant prose
- Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view
- Misplaced Pages:Pages needing attention
- Misplaced Pages:Peer review
- Misplaced Pages:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Misplaced Pages:Village pump
- Misplaced Pages:Boilerplate text
- Misplaced Pages:IRC channel
- Misplaced Pages:Mailing lists
- Misplaced Pages:Current polls
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam 16:08, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Edit Summaries
Please try to make your edit summaries actively and fully explain what you are doing to an article. For instance, your most recent summary to Lyndon LaRouche said that you added some information, but it failed to note that you were also basically reverting Everyking/Adam Carr.
Also, you may want to look at the talk page for that article - I'm trying to bring both sides together to hash out specific issues and objections, and if you could raise some with concrete evidence instead of continual and blanket reversions, it would be really helpful.
Thanks. Snowspinner 20:51, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Regardless, your version is deleting masses of information. If that information is inaccurate, then you are right to remove it, but I have not seen a good and concrete accounting of where the problems with the information are. (The Herschel list does a good job of listing what parts you take issue with, but it's very weak on citations.)
- It is not acceptable to have "two competing versions of an article" perpetually reverting each other. You need to work towards compromise. I am asking, on Lyndon LaRouche, for you to take the first step. (Whereas on the other article I'm currently trying to mediate dispute on, the political views article, I'm asking Adam et al to take the first step). Please pick five aspects of the longer version of the article that are, in your view, inaccurate, and explain why, with objective and checkable evidence to back you up. Snowspinner 21:08, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
Eurasian Land Bridge
Please cease your reversions at Eurasian Land-Bridge as they violate the ArbCom decision in the Lyndon LaRouche case re Original Research: See AndyL 09:01, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Sockpuppet?
Weed Harper, I found what appears to be some posts of yours on Usenet, and they were sent from IP address 64.30.208.48, which was recently blocked from Misplaced Pages for posting unverifiable LaRouche material. Have you been posting to Misplaced Pages using user:64.30.208.48 as a sockpuppet? The same IP address, which belongs to Link Line Communications, has been reported for sending pro-LaRouche spam around the Web. I'm posting below one of the Usenet posts I found. I'd appreciate your comments. I don't mind debating with genuine editors, but it gets a bit much when the same editor is sending out multiple posts with different user names. Slim 07:36, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
From: weed_harper@bigheavyworld.com (Weed Harper) Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.guitar Subject: Re: What was the "standard pitch" of the guitar at the time of Tarrega? Date: 25 Jan 2004 13:13:27 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4db933f4.0401251313.25f577c6@posting.google.com> References: <2c3925ab.0401190723.2796baae@posting.google.com> <pn2o00lkjebrk1539521tcqvkupl56iodn@4ax.com> <400c539d.2730541@news.compuserve.com> <mp7o00lbpqtvhaqntqj9n3sfm0cgtmk2vd@4ax.com> <2c3925ab.0401192314.3892e930@posting.google.com> <A5cPb.21229$Mb7.770@lakeread04> <7d424f23.0401201323.a9b32f1@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.30.208.48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1075065207 29272 127.0.0.1 (25 Jan 2004 21:13:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:13:27 +0000 (UTC) > "Evan Pyle" <enpyle@cox.net> wrote in message news:<A5cPb.21229$Mb7.770@lakeread04>... > > I contacted this Schiller Institute because of my interest in their push in > > reestablishing A=432. > > Big mistake. > > They are an arm of Lyndon Larouche's organization. His people hounded me > > mercilessly, trying to "evangelize" me to their political positions. > > That is fucking hilarious! Why do the Larouchies care about > 432? Is it part of their "Queen deals dope" world conspiracy > theory or what? I will have to look in on these guys. I can't > resist a good conspiracy theory. I can't either, but for my money, nothing beats the "Osama did September 11" theory.