Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements/Endorsements/Ed Poor: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004 | Candidate statements | Endorsements Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:29, 30 November 2004 editRebroad (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,715 edits →Support← Previous edit Revision as of 20:01, 30 November 2004 edit undoMirv (talk | contribs)16,966 edits →[]: my endorsementNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
* Support ] 12:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC) * Support ] 12:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
* Support. A good example of someone with a POV but doesn't let it conflict. --] 18:29, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC) * Support. A good example of someone with a POV but doesn't let it conflict. --] 18:29, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
* An obvious choice. ]]&nbsp;] 20:01, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)


====Oppose==== ====Oppose====

Revision as of 20:01, 30 November 2004

Ed Poor

Support

  • Intelligent, dedicated, fairminded, diffident (sometimes slightly maddeningly so), a natural choice for arbitrator. Easy endorsement. -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 23:00, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support, an obvious choice. Fred Bauder 11:24, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • Ed would make an excellent arbitator. He has my full support. Theresa Knott (Tart, knees hot) 11:28, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Perfect arbcomm material. Has all it takes. JFW | T@lk 17:42, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Strongly support. ] 22:11, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. --Viriditas 10:22, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. I completely disagree with Eds POV on most things, but there can be no doubt that he is one of the strongest fighters for NPOV. I also agree with him about temp bans, i think there should be far more of these. The bellman 11:29, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
  • Support --Josiah 22:52, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Maybe the best example of a Wikipedian respected by users who otherwise disagree. Cribcage 17:48, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support Slim 12:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. A good example of someone with a POV but doesn't let it conflict. --Rebroad 18:29, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • An obvious choice. —No-One Jones  20:01, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Oppose. Engages in POV wars. --] 06:19, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Shameless bigot. Creates articles to justify his bigotry. - Xed 12:08, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose. POV merchant nonpareil. Sjc 08:01, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)