Talk:Foxconn: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:48, 7 November 2017 editInternetArchiveBot (talk \| contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,385,769 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6) (Geo Swan)← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:56, 27 April 2018 edit undoClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,378,947 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Foxconn/Archives/2015. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	}}		}}
	{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix={{TALKPAGENAME}}\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}		{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix={{TALKPAGENAME}}\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}

	== Suicide numbers, corrected. ==

	To be fair I very rarely hear of anyone committing suicide while one the job. I think this is what people find so appalling. Unless the numbers are of national averages of suicides at your job while working, they don't really compare.

	:I corrected the numbers of suicide within this article. The media and also this article stated that the number of suicides was high, but with about 450000 employees, it was FAR below china's average number. Used 2 (English) Misplaced Pages articles as source.

	Although these suicides are widely discussed in the media, the number of suicides is far below the Chinese national average. With Foxconn having 458,999 employees and a national average of 13.9 on each 100,000 people who commit suicides, a number of 67.6 suicides would be considered normal for one year. As the discussed deaths are in the first 5 months of the year, 28 deaths would be equal to the national Chinese average. Foxconn only has 10 employees who died because of suicide during this period.

	] (]) 12:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

	:Can you please find a citation that says all these things? As we discussed on my talkpage and your talkpage you cannot go around and start collecting facts and figures and then putting them together on your own. A reliable source must put these calculations together, not you. ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 15:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
	:: I can give the numbers. And its no rocketscience to see that the number is far below average... http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/chin.pdf --> Number of suicides in China. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2009/snapshots/11204.html --> Number of Foxconn employees... ] (]) 15:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

	:::The numbers may be correct BUT the calculations based on these numbers, the comparisons and the conclusions made from these calculations are yours. This is called synthesis ] and original research ] and this is a really bad thing around here. Please refer to the links I just showed you. It explains why it is so bad to do that in great detail. ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 15:16, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

	::::So right now everyone who does slightly more research as that what is massively published lately, can see that the media is making a big issue out of nothing, its not that there are huge amounts of suicides at foxconn.. So why publish incorrect info at wikipedia? Its more like it is a hard gossip that people take over. But a small calculation everyone can make learns that those numbers are not that high as it sounds. In one of the wiki-articles you where refering too, an example with the UN is given. Lets take that example, and lets say one newspaper picks it up as "Since the start of the UN, 160 wars started", and they put it in a context where they suggest that the UN is involved with it (as what is happening with Foxconn right now). Should that be pickedup by wikipedia? Imho the current "gossips" should be removed or there should be stated that the numbers are far below average. And of course you are not going to read in a newspaper that "Foxconn has only 30% of the expected suicides", as its not interesting. "10 suicides in 5 months" sound spectacular. And thats what is bothering me. ] (]) 08:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
	:::::I understand, but unfortunately this is how Misplaced Pages works. The operating concept here is verifiability ] not ]. ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 18:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

	::::: So what you are saying is that it's OK for a contributor to selectively use data to vent her/his malice at the capitalist system (or whatever is bugging these people), but if someone wants to include a reality check, woe betide them. If facts (expressed numerically) are correct, simple arithmetical calculations on them are ipso facto correct. It should be perfectly obvious that juxtaposition of known, verified and referenced facts isn't the same as "original research" giving new "facts" which can't be verified (unless another person repeats the exercise). Or does one have to "cite" an "authority" to say that 2+2=4? I believe Misplaced Pages has a big problem with what "original research" is - I'd rather think that than that W is promoting the fashionable anti-capitalist agenda which permeates the article. The least you should allow is for the contentious "information" to be removed, or marked to show that it's open to plausible challenge. ] (]) 03:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
	{{outdent\|:::::}} <small>(<span style="color:#555;">Comment from uninvolved editor</span>)</small><!--]--> — Unfortunately, Dr. K's the messenger on this. Misplaced Pages doesn't accept ] under any circumstances, and that's to prevent ] that can POV push, as you suggest could happen with a contributor manipulating the numbers. Generally speaking, the rule of thumb is that, if you can find a ], it's credible for inclusion. And finding the proper numbers for Foxconn's suicide rate is hard to do, at best. ] (]) 03:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

	== External links modified ==		== External links modified ==

Revision as of 01:56, 27 April 2018

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Foxconn article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Companies Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Misplaced Pages:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Foxconn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100828085014/http://www.businessweek.com:80/news/2010-06-02/foxconn-workers-in-china-say-meaningless-life-sparks-suicides.html to http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-02/foxconn-workers-in-china-say-meaningless-life-sparks-suicides.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Foxconn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Number of factories

In the operations section, under China, the first line states that Foxconn has 12 factories in China, whereas the next paragraph states that there are 15 factories in the Longhua campus alone. Is the Longhua campus considered one factory in the "12 factories" statement above it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.177.238.51 (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Foxconn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Foxconn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120421203344/http://topics.scmp.com/news/china-news-watch/article/Struggle-for-Foxconn-girl-who-wanted-to-die to http://topics.scmp.com/news/china-news-watch/article/Struggle-for-Foxconn-girl-who-wanted-to-die

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Categories: