| Revision as of 22:57, 9 November 2017 editJohn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers215,495 edits →Mandatory notice: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:07, 11 November 2017 edit undoDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,086 edits →Your question to me about why I didn't give editors 3 RR notices: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->--] (]) 22:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC) | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->--] (]) 22:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == Your question to me about why I didn't give editors 3 RR notices == | |||
| First, there's the obvious reason. They didn't even get to 3RR. You did. Your attempt to get Drmies blocked at ] was turned down by two Administrators and was clearly a retaliation. | |||
| Secondly, the other obvious reason. I saw nothing here or in your archives that suggested you'd ever had a warning. The other two editors quite clearly knew about edit warring. No one gets to over 80,000 edits like Corkiethehornetfan without knowing about it (and I saw discussion in his archives), and Drmies is clearly aware. All of my colleagues on the Arbitration Committee are very well versed in all our sanction policies or we wouldn't have been elected. And he has taken people to 3RR before. Of course, now that you are clear about edit warring, it isn't necessary to warn you before blocking you for it. So I'd advise you to stop at 2RR in the future, 3RR isn't an entitlement. ] ] 08:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:07, 11 November 2017
 Archives |
/Archive_1 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
 | Welcome to Sparkie82's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. |
Wanted to let you know that I'd retired
Thank you for earlier affirming interactions. See User:Leprof_7272 page for details if interested. Bonne chance. Le Prof 73.210.155.96 (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
Your recent editing history at Current members of the United States Senate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 08:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Mandatory notice
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33--John (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Your question to me about why I didn't give editors 3 RR notices
First, there's the obvious reason. They didn't even get to 3RR. You did. Your attempt to get Drmies blocked at WP:ANEW was turned down by two Administrators and was clearly a retaliation. Secondly, the other obvious reason. I saw nothing here or in your archives that suggested you'd ever had a warning. The other two editors quite clearly knew about edit warring. No one gets to over 80,000 edits like Corkiethehornetfan without knowing about it (and I saw discussion in his archives), and Drmies is clearly aware. All of my colleagues on the Arbitration Committee are very well versed in all our sanction policies or we wouldn't have been elected. And he has taken people to 3RR before. Of course, now that you are clear about edit warring, it isn't necessary to warn you before blocking you for it. So I'd advise you to stop at 2RR in the future, 3RR isn't an entitlement. Doug Weller talk 08:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)