| Revision as of 13:24, 12 November 2017 editE-960 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,992 edits →Note← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:43, 14 November 2017 edit undoE-960 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,992 editsm clean upNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for March 21== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thre are several problems with the section. I haven't studied the history of edits but you edited the section recently. Please correct or tag the section.] (]) 07:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi user ], the Language section was heavily edited by user Italiano111, I just went in after to fix some of those changes. If you feel there there are still issues that need to be readjusted please do not hesitate to correct them. --] (]) 09:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for April 20== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nice work == | == Nice work == | ||
| Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for all the recent work you've put into the ] article. It's a good step in removing the issues that often plague Polish topics on Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 20:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC) | Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for all the recent work you've put into the ] article. It's a good step in removing the issues that often plague Polish topics on Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 20:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi ], many thanks! I figured a bit of grammar fixing was in order. :D --] (]) 20:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | :Hi ], many thanks! I figured a bit of grammar fixing was in order. :D --] (]) 20:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == May 2016 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| {{{!}} class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" {{!}}- | |||
| ! style="background-color: #FAA;" {{!}} <div style="font-size:112%;">List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page<span style="font-size:88%;margin-left:3em;">(Click show <span style="font-size:130%;">⇨</span>)</span></div> | |||
| {{!}}- | |||
| {{!}} style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " {{!}} <div style="font-size:112%;"> | |||
| *<nowiki>]</nowiki>{{red|''']]'''}}<nowiki></nowiki> | |||
| *<nowiki>spatial decoration may be found in the west façade of the ]</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki>.]]</nowiki> | |||
| *<nowiki>based on Borromini's vision of interlocking elliptical spaces. At São Pedro dos Clérigos, Recife</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki>, a conventional stucco-and-stone façade is enlivened by "a high scrolled gable squeezed tightly</nowiki> | |||
| *<nowiki>of the gardens in the composition of the palace, as is exemplified by ]</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki>, where the architect ], the designer ] and the gardener [[André</nowiki> | |||
| *<nowiki>of church architecture was provided by the Jesuit church in ]</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki>: the wall-pillar church, a ]ed nave accompanied by large open chapels separated by</nowiki> | |||
| </div> | |||
| {{!}}} | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -2, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 13:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Gdansk vote notice == | |||
| The usage of Danzig vs. Gdansk is determined in the Gdansk vote as follows: {{Gdansk-Vote-Notice}} ] (]) 07:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for June 5== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ], GDP edits in lead == | |||
| Hey | |||
| Just wanted to say: even before my lead edits, I noticed that you're regularly taking care of ], and I felt a bit bad editing without introducing myself on the talk page first, especially since it's a semi-protected article (but at least I tried to explain what I was doing in the edit summary). Thanks for not taking it the wrong way, as it sometimes can happen if some edits come out of nowhere :) | |||
| - ] (]) 09:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :], many thanks for catching the inaccurate statistics and overstatements, I've been trying to sift through the article text for some time now, picking out things like that. --] (]) 12:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == hey == | |||
| ] (]) 16:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :hello? | |||
| ::in response to your talking on diff please view them to me? ] (]) 16:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::sorry, can you clarify a bit? --] (]) 16:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::: diff here<ref></ref> what it means? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::::Bit outdated, the item is from 1 November 2014, this thing is closed and over with. --] (]) 17:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, E-960. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/49&oldid=750794223 --> | |||
| == German Language map == | |||
| Hi, concerning your cancelation about the map on german dialects, there are no territorial claims, this are the places where German is recognised as a minority language (see German language article), furthermore the previous map was more accurate in term of dialect and widespread use. But I have to agree on the fact that I would personally prefer a map just covering the present day political borders of Germany especially in an article about.. Germany :) | |||
| For instance, nowadays very few people speak alsatian in Alsace, and the French-Dutch dialect in Flandre is almost close to noth... and it is confusing to talk about german language and see a map of Netherlands as well. The map that you put is confusing since it is about the Germanic dialects and not about the german dialects --] (]) 10:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == The "show preview" button is your friend (Talk:Blue Army (Poland)) == | |||
| It takes a slight extra effort, but in the long run makes sense.--] (]) 19:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :], can you clarify what you had in mind, it just takes a slight extra effort. --] (]) 17:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Note== | |||
| {{multiple image| align = right | direction = horizontal | header = | header_align = left/right/center | footer = | footer_align = left | image1 = Llengües germàniques new.png | width1 = 270 | caption1 = Pls notice all the purported German "speaking areas" in modern Poland, Czech Rep. and Kaliningrad Russia (a completely false depiction)| image2 = Lenguas germánicas.PNG| width2 = 185 | caption2 = Now, pls notice how a second map shows the same subject matter, yet is very different in the claims it makes}} | |||
| {{multiple image| align = right | direction = horizontal | header = | header_align = left/right/center | footer = | footer_align = left | image1 = Nazi Germany.png | width1 = 190 | caption1 = Greater German Reich in 1944| image2 = Germanic Groups ca. 0CE.jpg| width2 = 185 | caption2 = "Germanic Peoples" as presented in a German atlas from 2001}} | |||
| I noticed you've been removing ] from a lot of pages (], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]), often replacing it with ] or ]. You sometimes marked this as a "minor edit". I'd really advise first discussing such things patiently before radically changing long-standing stable versions of this many articles. I don't have any strong feelings one way or another but the fact that the maps have been mostly stable so far means the burden lies with you. Linguistic maps are also not the same as culture maps, which typically denote where certain similarities in archeological findings were made. Please also remember Misplaced Pages is not a ] or ]. Nearly all of your edits seem to be to articles about Poland, some of them being mass deletions of sourced information without much of an explanation. to reinsert your own edit 5 times before establishing consensus (thus going against ]) and then one of these users for edit warring is way out of line. ] (]) 15:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :], hello, yes I noticed that there is a bit of POV pushing on these topics. The map of the "Germanic dialects" oddly matches old Nazi boundaries of ], and yet, it is impossible to create such definitive borders of "old Germanic" dialects because there is no written record of them and the identity of some of the groups is debated (archeological findings do not support such definitive and clear cut boundaries as the map proposes), yet the boundaries that map proposes look a lot like modern national borders, even though archeological data supports the theory that the lands may have been inhabited by passing or mixed ethnic groups at the same time (many of the sources confirm just that). Finally, please notice that on some of the more important articles such as ], ] or ] I did initiate a talk section, apologies for any poorly marked edits. --] (]) 18:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :*Also, ], please note that on the talk page for the Slavs article, three other editors agreed with the points I raised that the text was off topic, Iryna Harpy, Jirka.h23, and filelakeshoe. So, again in this case there was a debate on the issue. --] (]) 18:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::Btw, here are some other maps that show '''un-true''' fake ideas/concepts (no reference sources provided), which could be described as 'suggesting old pro-German views', and trying to justify territorial claims in places like modern Poland or the Czech Republic: and --] (]) 22:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:43, 14 November 2017
Nice work
Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for all the recent work you've put into the Poland article. It's a good step in removing the issues that often plague Polish topics on Misplaced Pages. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Samotny Wędrowiec, many thanks! I figured a bit of grammar fixing was in order. :D --E-960 (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)