Revision as of 17:58, 29 November 2017 editVahid (talk | contribs)398 edits →Regarding removing content from Star (football badge)' Page: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:24, 5 December 2017 edit undoVahid (talk | contribs)398 edits →Regarding removing content from Star (football badge)' PageNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Thanks, a fellow wikipedian. ] (]) 17:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC) | Thanks, a fellow wikipedian. ] (]) 17:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of ] to ] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 13:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:24, 5 December 2017
Dear user, wins in penalty shootouts are considered draws, based on Fifa rules, so Perspolis has 21 wins in Tehran derby and not 22. Also all important derbies have a head to head trophy section, so I think it is needed, so can you please tell me why that is not needed? vathlu (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
Your recent editing history at Tehran derby shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Optakeover 11:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Tehran derby. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~Oshwah~ 00:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Regarding removing content from Star (football badge)' Page
Dear Yenwitch,
Please stop removing Misplaced Pages's content for no good reason otherwise I will have to report you, discuss your opinion first if it needs be.
Thanks, a fellow wikipedian. vathlu (talk) 17:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Vathlu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Star (football badge) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. vathlu (talk) 13:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)