Revision as of 15:50, 11 December 2017 editJamesharrison2014 (talk | contribs)445 edits Undid revision 814875138 by ValarianB (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:52, 13 December 2017 edit undoRusf10 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,121 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:::::It is not libel to state an opinion of a blogger's veracity in reporting. I have restored the comment and you are cautioned against tampering with another user's comments. As several editors have objected to the listing of this non-notable figure, you will not restore it unless ] can be reached to do so. ] (]) 12:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC) | :::::It is not libel to state an opinion of a blogger's veracity in reporting. I have restored the comment and you are cautioned against tampering with another user's comments. As several editors have objected to the listing of this non-notable figure, you will not restore it unless ] can be reached to do so. ] (]) 12:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
==List of correspondents== | |||
It's a real shame that I can't edit this now because of the clown who keep insisting of having Michael Moates in the article. To weigh in on that, I can't find any reliable source that he is a permanent member. He may just have ad day pass as per this article: . Once we can edit again, I propose: 1. Only correspondents with "hard passes" be listed here 2. All correspondents who are currently listed should be removed unless a reliable source can be found showing that they have a "hard pass"--] (]) 02:52, 13 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:52, 13 December 2017
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
White House Press Corps
I sought but did not find an article on the white house press corps. Mathiastck 18:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
I am quite surprised that this article is so useless. I hope someone comes up with something, but I don't know anything about them. --Sven Erixon 06:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
External Link
The link provided should be removed. It is a blog that states "This site is not associated with the White House Correspondents' Association or its members in any way. We are an independent media watchdog source providing information and commentary on the relationship between the press and the White House. We welcome your input and discussion." It might be a fine blog which covers the White House but is unrelated to the white house press corps, the subject of this article. --AD 12:56 Jan 28 2008 (CST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.84.199.13 (talk)
Done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.84.199.84 (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Move this page
Any objection to moving this page from "White House Press Corps" to "White House press corps"? - Walkiped 03:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
possible COI
It was a simple edit but was reverted for lack of references. The editor identified himself on my talk page as being one of the CNN reporters mentioned in the edit. Probably innocent enough of an edit (assuming there are references available) but I offered to assit with the edit anyway since the editor in question mentioned being new to it all. Just an FYI.--RadioFan (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
June 2013: Article lacks information
This article is lacks information about who determines the composition of the press corps, or then number of members in it. Who makes this decision, and how has the size and composition of the press corps changed over time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.9.130 (talk) 23:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Proposed Change of Subtitle "Correspondents"
Per suggestion GabeIglesia expanded the opening paragraph to reflect the fact that the term "White House press corps" is generally understood to include, not just correspondents and reporters, but all media assigned to or covering the White House, such as producers and photographers.
In line with that, subtitle "Correspondents" should be broadened to reflect same -- perhaps "Members" ?
Also suggest that revised opening paragraph be further revised to say "group of journalists, correspondents, and other members of the media . . ."
Azzurroribbon (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Sourcing for current members
Azzurroribbon, where are you getting your information from? I ask because I'm working on Jack Posobiec. Posobiec left Rebel Media last month, so does that mean his access to White House press briefings has been revoked? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Dr. Fleischman, Jack Posobiec may still have access to White House press briefings via a day pass issued by the White House, if the WH chooses to give him a pass. He did not previously have a hard pass, as far as I know. His name was added to the correspondents list, and later removed, but neither the addition nor removal was made by me. If he obtains a pass or passes in the future, and his "beat," so to speak, is covering WH press briefings, then he would most likely qualify as a correspondent for purposes of this page. My sources are varied: announcements by the various media, posted articles and verified Twitter accounts of correspondents, websites detailing media moves, and the briefings themselves. Azzurroribbon (talk) 02:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Michael Moates
(Personal attack removed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.103.201.192 (talk) 19:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Where is proof of what you say above? Please do not revert Moates info again without a proper reason and some proof. WP:BRD. Lacypaperclip (talk) 06:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Neither Moates nor "Nation One News Foundation" are notable. Individuals or businesses that are listed in a list article, or a list subsection of a article, need to meet a basic level of notability as defined by the Misplaced Pages. Take for example our articles on universities that have a "Notable Alumni" section; to be included, an entrant has to have some demonstrable notability, some reliable source that shows that they are important. Same with something like List of Irish musical groups, one cannot include every Irishman/woman who picks up a hurdy-gurdy, there has to be a citation to prove it. ValarianB (talk) 13:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
(Personal attack removed) -=Eduardo=- (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- The unsigned comment above is actually libel due to the fact that it is inaccurate. Mr. Moates does not produce false headlines. Just because you may disagree does not make them false. He is not adding himself I am adding him. I am new to Misplaced Pages and this was my first article. I am still learning. Moates does not only write for this non-profit news foundation. He contributes to Washington Examiner, Red Alert Politics, Independent Journal Review, and formerly TheBlaze. Eduardo, I am not Moates all the information I have gotten is public record online. Please don't make assumptions. -=James=- (talk) 18:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- It is not libel to state an opinion of a blogger's veracity in reporting. I have restored the comment and you are cautioned against tampering with another user's comments. As several editors have objected to the listing of this non-notable figure, you will not restore it unless consensus can be reached to do so. ValarianB (talk) 12:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
List of correspondents
It's a real shame that I can't edit this now because of the clown who keep insisting of having Michael Moates in the article. To weigh in on that, I can't find any reliable source that he is a permanent member. He may just have ad day pass as per this article: . Once we can edit again, I propose: 1. Only correspondents with "hard passes" be listed here 2. All correspondents who are currently listed should be removed unless a reliable source can be found showing that they have a "hard pass"--Rusf10 (talk) 02:52, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages articles that use American English
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Unassessed Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles