Misplaced Pages

Ahmed Osman (author): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:45, 20 October 2006 editAbcXyz (talk | contribs)300 editsm sp← Previous edit Revision as of 17:00, 20 October 2006 edit undoThanatosimii (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,481 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
His first theory was that ] (of the famed Coat of Many Colors) was the ] of ], Yuya. In 1987 this claim became his first book ''Stranger in the Valley of the Kings''. His first theory was that ] (of the famed Coat of Many Colors) was the ] of ], Yuya. In 1987 this claim became his first book ''Stranger in the Valley of the Kings''.


Most mainstream Egyptologists do not agree with his theories, some even rejecting them as nonsense.<ref name=Ahram>http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/672/profile.htm</ref><ref>http://www.metimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20050408-051324-4388r</ref>Donald Redford wrote a scathing review of ''Stranger in the Valley of the Kings'' for BAR.<ref>Redford, Donald B. Review of ''Stranger in the Valley of the Kings'' by Ahmed Osman (though his books get mostly positive reviews). BAR 15/2 p.8</ref> Osman states that the reason mainstream Egyptologists do not accept his theories and the theories of others is because, "Egyptologists have established their careers on their interpretations", no matter how unlikely they may be, and that to accept other theories could give them less authority.<ref Name=Ahram/> Most mainstream Egyptologists do not agree with his theories, some even rejecting them as nonsense.<ref name=Ahram>http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/672/profile.htm</ref><ref>http://www.metimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20050408-051324-4388r</ref>Donald Redford wrote a scathing review of ''Stranger in the Valley of the Kings'' for BAR.<ref>Redford, Donald B. Review of ''Stranger in the Valley of the Kings'' by Ahmed Osman. BAR 15/2 p.8</ref> Osman states that the reason mainstream Egyptologists do not accept his theories and the theories of others is because, "Egyptologists have established their careers on their interpretations", no matter how unlikely they may be, and that to accept other theories could give them less authority.<ref Name=Ahram/>


==Works== ==Works==

Revision as of 17:00, 20 October 2006

Ahmed Osman (born 1934) is an Egyptian-born author and Egyptologist. He was put forward a handful of theories which are mainly rejected by mainstream Egyptologists.

He has identifyied the Semitic-born Egyptian official Joseph with the Egyptian official Yuya, and asserted the identification of Hebrew liberator Moses with the Egyptian monotheist pharaoh Akhenaten Ahmed Osman has even claimed that Moses and Akhenaten were the same person, supporting his belief by interpreting aspects of biblical and Egyptian history. Apart from the most obvious alleged correlation, that Atenism can be considered monotheistic and related to Judaism, there are alleged to be others, including a ban on idol worship and the similarity of the name Aten to the Hebrew Adon, or "Lord". This would mesh with Osman's other claim that Akhenaten's maternal grandfather Yuya was the same person as the Biblical Joseph.

Born in Cairo in 1934, Osman was a law student at Cairo University before becoming a journalist. He moved to London in 1964. He became interested in possible links between the Bible and recent archaeological discoveries in Egypt, looking for possible reasons for the historical tension between Egypt and Israel.

His first theory was that Joseph (of the famed Coat of Many Colors) was the father-in-law of Amenhotep III, Yuya. In 1987 this claim became his first book Stranger in the Valley of the Kings.

Most mainstream Egyptologists do not agree with his theories, some even rejecting them as nonsense.Donald Redford wrote a scathing review of Stranger in the Valley of the Kings for BAR. Osman states that the reason mainstream Egyptologists do not accept his theories and the theories of others is because, "Egyptologists have established their careers on their interpretations", no matter how unlikely they may be, and that to accept other theories could give them less authority.

Works

  • Stranger in the Valley of the Kings: Solving the Mystery of an Ancient Egyptian Mummy (1987)
alternate edition: Stranger in the Valley of the Kings: The Identification of Yuya as the Patriarch Joseph (1988)
alternate edition: Hebrew Pharaohs of Egypt: The Secret Lineage of the Patriarch Joseph (2003)
  • Moses: Pharaoh of Egypt: The Mystery of Akhenaten Resolved (1990)
alternate edition: Moses and Akhenaten: The Secret History of Egypt at the Time of the Exodus (2002)
  • The House of the Messiah: Controversial Revelations on the Historical Jesus (1992)
alternate edition: The House of the Messiah: A Brilliant New Solution to the Enduring Mystery of the Historical Jesus (1994)
alternate edition: Jesus in the House of the Pharaohs: The Essene Revelations on the Historical Jesus (2004)

References

  1. ^ http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/672/profile.htm
  2. http://www.metimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20050408-051324-4388r
  3. Redford, Donald B. Review of Stranger in the Valley of the Kings by Ahmed Osman. BAR 15/2 p.8

External links

Categories: