| Revision as of 09:57, 28 February 2018 editLegacypac (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers158,031 edits Nominated for deletion; see Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Operational Chow ring. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:09, 9 March 2018 edit undoPremeditated Chaos (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators127,856 edits MFD closed as merge (XFDcloser)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{mfd-mergeto|Chow group|Draft:Operational Chow ring|9 March 2018|Talk:Chow group}} | |||
| {{mfd|help=off}} | |||
| The basic question was whether there is a ]: | The basic question was whether there is a ]: | ||
| :<math>A^*(X) \to \operatorname{H}^*(X, \mathbb{Z}).</math> | :<math>A^*(X) \to \operatorname{H}^*(X, \mathbb{Z}).</math> | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 9 March 2018
 | This page was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 9 March 2018 with a consensus to merge the content into the page Chow group. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the page for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use the destination page's talk page. |
The basic question was whether there is a cycle map:
If X is smooth, such a map exists since is the usual Chow ring of X. (Totaro 2014) harv error: no target: CITEREFTotaro2014 (help) has shown that rationally there is no such a map with good properties even if X is a linear variety, roughly a variety admitting a cell decomposition. He also notes that Voevodsky’s motivic cohomology ring is "probably more useful " than the operational Chow ring for a singular scheme (§ 8 of loc. cit.)
is the usual
References
- W. Fulton, R. MacPherson, F. Sottile, and B. Sturmfels, ‘Intersection theory on spherical varieties’, J. Alg. Geom. 4 (1995), 181–193.
- Totaro, Chow groups, Chow cohomology and linear varieties
 | This geometry-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |