Revision as of 18:57, 13 March 2018 editTryptofish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers69,579 edits Undid revision 830148192 by Dream Focus (talk) Nothing pointy about it. The only reason to revert it would be if you intend to violate CANVASS.Tag: Undo← Previous edit |
Revision as of 19:31, 13 March 2018 edit undoDream Focus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,009 edits You are not a member of this wikiproject, nor do any other wikiprojects have that. There is no canvassing, despite your ridiculous accusations elsewhereTag: UndoNext edit → |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
<center>'''<big>Project Code of conduct</big>'''</center> |
|
<center>'''<big>Project Code of conduct</big>'''</center> |
|
] |
|
] |
|
* Please note that '''WikiProject ]''' is a ] intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting ], nor about vote-stacking. Do not violate the ]. If you comment in a deletion discussion after seeing a notice about it here, you should disclose that you came to the discussion from here. |
|
* Please note that '''WikiProject ]''' is a ] intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting ], nor about vote-stacking. |
|
* '''Focus on ] content.''' For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic ] by adding ] ] with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion. |
|
* '''Focus on ] content.''' For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic ] by adding ] ] with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion. |
|
* '''Show the light.''' If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Misplaced Pages's ]. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to. |
|
* '''Show the light.''' If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Misplaced Pages's ]. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to. |