| Revision as of 14:44, 24 October 2006 editDppowell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,413 edits →User notice: temporary 3RR block← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:24, 24 October 2006 edit undoStifle (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators84,067 edits Now unblocked, removing unblock reviewedNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|the fourth edit was actually made according consensus reached after discussion in the talkpage |decline=Consensus or not, 3RR is an electric fence - if it was consensus there are several hundred thousand other editors who could have done it. -- ] (]) 21:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)}} | |||
| Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. | |||
| You were blocked by William M. Connolley for the following reason (see our blocking policy): | |||
| 3rr on Julian the Apostate | |||
| * | * | ||
| * | * | ||
Revision as of 21:24, 24 October 2006
User notice: temporary 3RR block
- There was no consensus; the user is pushing a POV based on bald assertions regarding the existence of some universal "Roman Pagan" faith that supposedly existed in the 4th century. He has offered no evidence for his position, while there are reams of modern scholarship confirming the usage in my most recent edit. His idea of "consensus" is that nobody was willing to get into an edit/revert war with him. Dppowell 20:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Dppowel, I was referring to the "Pagan" vs. "non-Christian" matter. Which is what you denounced me for ( )--Panarjedde 20:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Furthermore, it looks like your last edit confirmed most of my last edit, the one I was blocked for.
- All I did was change the capitals to reflect academic usage. The "pagan vs non-Christian" label debate is separate, and I haven't significantly involved myself in it to this point. Dppowell 21:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
--Panarjedde 20:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Right, but in the edits of mine you posted, I was reverting the "non-Christian" vs. "Pagan" matter, not the "pagan" vs. "Pagan" one, as you were referring.--Panarjedde 21:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's a shame that you can't play by Misplaced Pages's rules, because you have clearly made some worthwhile contributions to articles. You just seem to have a hard time believing that others' viewpoints might sometimes be more appropriate for encyclopedic content, and you are seemingly unable to restrain yourself from forcibly asserting your POV. If you ever return from your block, please reconsider this approach. Dppowell 14:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Right, but in the edits of mine you posted, I was reverting the "non-Christian" vs. "Pagan" matter, not the "pagan" vs. "Pagan" one, as you were referring.--Panarjedde 21:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding reversions made on October 23 2006 to Julian the Apostate
Unfair block
I wish to apologize for blocking you yesterday, as you correctly pointed out you made four reverts but it was outside the 24 hour limit. As soon as your current block expires I will make a note in your block log that the block was not correct. Stifle (talk) 21:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Indefinitely blocked
As you have admitted to being a sock puppet of a banned user at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kwame Nkrumah, you are also blocked indefinitely. Stifle (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)