Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:58, 29 October 2006

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

IMPORTANT: If your business has to do with an article for deletion, read this notice first.

Archives:

• /Archive 1 (January 2004 – 27 July 2005)
• /Archive 2 (1 August – 31 December 2005)
• /Archive 3 (2 January – 21 March 2006)
• /Archive 4 (21 March 2006 – 29 June 2006)
• /Archive 5 (7 July 2006 – 27 September 2006)

History of Argentina and Talk:National Reorganization Process

Hi Pablo! Nice work at translating Noche de los Lapices! I didn't do it now, I'm a bit in a hurry, but maybe adding the ages of the high school students would be useful? Else, I've left a comment proposing to rename National Reorganization Process, your opinion is of course needed! Que te vaya bien, saludos! Tazmaniacs 12:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The Hype about Hydrogen

Thanks for your comment on the talk page today. I feel that Potomacfever is attacking me for some reason, perhaps because he has political disagreements with the book and its author, who happens to be a friend of mine. I did not write the article on this book, but since I saw it, I have tried to improve it. And as for Romm's bio, I merely split it out of the Hype article and then expanded it with online sources. Today Potomacfever put the author's bio up for AfD. I would value your input to the article itself and also to the Afd for Joseph J. Romm. This whole issue needs more editors to get involved and resolve it. Regards, -- Ssilvers 23:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Should this go back in the article?: The book states, "Neither government policy nor business investment should be based on the belief that hydrogen cars will have meaningful commercial success in the near or medium term." I think that's the core of Romm's thesis. If you agree, please put it where you think best. I am trying to minimize my edits on the article, because of the accusations by Potomac. Thanks! -- Ssilvers 21:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Impersonator

Secret admirer? You mean a clone?

Is he vandalizing? I don't understand exactly what this means. The dugout 16:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

That's funny since I have never even touched the article in question, I don't get into politics here. The dugout 15:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandal on Néstor Kirchner

Greetings. I'm looking at the history of vandalism on this article. Can you help me here: look at (if you get this message within the next couple hours), and check all the accounts created between about 17:15 and 17:30 on 21 September. That's when the vandal was making most of his throwaway accounts. I've blocked one more obvious one (KingofAr) but maybe you will recognize some more. There is also a similar vandalism spree (which you may have noticed) on the Spanish wiki. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 01:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

That's because they are "aged" sockpuppets (he created them on 21 Sept) -- which is long enough to bypass sprotection. This is why it would be good to shoot them out of the user creation log. We also could request a checkuser on this. Thanks for your excellent work! Antandrus (talk) 01:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your contribution in The Quran and science article. Please spend some more time on the article and try to improve it. I am trying my best but have limited time. --- ابراهيم 17:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Can you please add from there in the Big Bang section. I really need to sleep. In case you do not find time to do that then I will try to do it tomorrow. Thanking you in anticipation. --- ابراهيم 22:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I think things are getting a bit out of hand at the Quran and Science article, Arrow740 is being pretty insulting. I am still too new to know exactly how to handle it, though I did put a note of the WP:Civil policy on the talk page, if that was not my place please let me know. Ratherhaveaheart

I'm sorry, but saying that "a drop of semen" and "a single sperm cell" are the same thing gets me angry. Any "insults" I made were, from my perspective, true observations. Anyway I think you've been something of a moderating influence on that article, though it looks like you don't care about it enough to keep it fair, or else when I came across it yesterday it wouldn't have been the poorly written, badly spelled list of half-truths that it was. Arrow740 05:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Atheism

If you don't mind my asking, why do you believe in it? Arrow740 07:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Please Guide

Is that possible that they delete the article now and then I work on my User space. I will try to give all the references and making it as best as possible. I will fairly also try to give other side views with references (you and other neutral people are also welcome to contribute). Once we are done than we could move it back? Is that possible ? --- ابراهيم 08:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

After The Quran and science was saved Ibrahimfaisal removed all my additions, so I renominated it for deletion. Could you weigh in? Arrow740 21:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Traduje las dos Marchas de la Paz

Las pasé al castellano, gracias por los Arts. en english. Interesante el tema de lo cómo una Constitución da "una" versión: la Constitución del reino de España dice que el idioma oficial es el castellano. Franco y los nazionalistas querían que fuese el español. Y en la Constitución Argentina no existen los aborígenes (¡palabra más peyorativa, difícil de pergreñar!, sino pueblos originarios). Saludos desde la calle 3 de Febrero 939, en la Rosario, en la primavera austral. Rosarinagazo 03:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

re: The Quran and science article

hello Pablo-flores, i know some time ago on the talk page you said you weren't going to bother with the article because of the state of affairs at that time. i do however believe your contributions would be extremely useful and i do think that we can move forward as long as the editors concentrate on working together instead of against each other. there are a number of reasonable editors popping up who seem to be interested in making something of this article, and as long as you are still interested i would definitely recommend you help contribute wherever you can. thank you. ITAQALLAH 22:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

hello, there is a dispute on Talk:The Quran and science about how WP:V is to be interpreted regarding published Muslim sources to present Muslim opinion. i thought it'd be useful to ask a more seasoned user to provide their thoughts, so so your comments on that matter would be greatly appreciated. ITAQALLAH 15:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Que tal!

Bueno aunque esto suene mas una cosa "myspacera" (mi spanglish es selectivo),siempre me alegra encontrar un vecino preocupado en probar que el eje del mundo (al menos el fìsico) no se encuentra en el noreste de aquella tierra situada entre Canada y el antigo virreinato de la nueva España,y que es escoltada por dos gigantes,uno Atlante y el otro Pacifico.

De todas formas,este paria cultural muy respetuosamente le saluda. El Gostro 05:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Foreign trade by country

• Foreign trade by country is a sub category of International Trade, and it is the same as international trade. --Endgame1 12:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• WP:CFD can you do it? I don't understand.

The Argentine

Not to defend people hiding behind IP addresses, but "the Argentine" used to be a perfectly normal way of referring to Argentina. Try, for instance, to google "The Argentine" and definition. I think it was probably due to the influence of French. -Yupik 09:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Indefinately blocked

User:24.199.238.170 has been indefinatley blocked for persistant vandalism.

--Suicidal tendancies 16:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Greetings and dulce de leche

Hey there, I'm Gustavo and I want to introduce myself and to collaborate in this beautiful project. I'm Uruguayan but I'm currently living in Spain, country where I'm studying to major in English. I hope we can keep in touch and help each other with language. By the way, "dulce de leche", as you mentioned it in your user page, is not Argentinian but Uruguayan as well, so I would rather use the word River Plate... You will see, there are several theories on the subject and you may have your opinions which do not prove to be fully considered as true or reliable evidence. Indeed, we should take into account the fact that Uruguay and Argentina were and still are countries with a similar history, more or less the same kind of culture and customs and, what is more, we both speak "Rioplatense Spanish", perhaps that being the reason why here, in Europe, people tend to associate Uruguay with Argentina and viceversa. They don't see the difference, then, I say, should we? It's not my aim to argue about something irrelevant but I thought we, as River Plate brothers, must take conscience of this fact and stop with that rivalry. Nice to meet you and I hope we can be friends. Sorry for expressing my point of view, lol. Regards, --Gustave - May I help you? 23:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC) PS: If you don't mind I'll put this in the discussion page of "dulce de leche".