| Revision as of 17:26, 11 May 2018 editGnanvit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users786 edits WP:DRC← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:10, 8 July 2018 edit undoGnanvit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users786 edits WP:DRCNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ::You did indeed provide sources. Terribly sorry about the revert, which I have re-reverted! ] (]) 09:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC) | ::You did indeed provide sources. Terribly sorry about the revert, which I have re-reverted! ] (]) 09:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ==Notice== | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| Familiarize yourself with above. The above is a notification that there are sanctions on the articles such as ], ], and others. In short words you will have to be more careful when you are editing these areas and avoid misrepresenting sources, edit warring or any other violations as described at ]. ] (]) 02:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==Discretionary sanctions alert== | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], ], and ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| Given your edits, across numerous articles where you are using your personal opinion over established reliable sources and engaging in ]-like discussion, I would now recommend you think again if your approach is correct. ] (]) 11:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :: {{ping|User:My Lord}} Please note that I haven't made any changes to the article ] since my first edit there was reverted almost a month ago. Given that this is the second time you have posted discretionary notices on my page for the mistake of disagreeing with you on the article "Ayurveda", I urge you to reconsider this. Attempt at ] is not the right way to reach a consensus about anything. (] (]) 11:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC)) | |||
| :::Looks like the first one was from Lorstaking, but it certainly is odd. I wonder if I should be expecting a similar attempt on my talk page? *chuckle*--] (]) 14:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Sorry for the late reply. In any case, always remember {{tqqi|This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date}}.<abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">]</abbr> If someone reports you at an administrator noticeboard or ] then it's of course different... —]] – 22:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:10, 8 July 2018
Welcome!
Hello, Chetan vit, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Yamna culture have not conformed to Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Misplaced Pages also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Favonian (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Favonian I had made some changes to article Yamna culture, modifying the dates of the archaeological culture to the accurate ones as per the reference https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/radiocarbon/article/view/16087. I had taken this step after posting in the Talk page of the said article. But my edit has been reverted unfortunately. Was the reference I gave not adequate or have I violated some other policy of Misplaced Pages? I would really appreciate a reason for why my edit was reverted.
- You did indeed provide sources. Terribly sorry about the revert, which I have re-reverted! Favonian (talk) 09:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC)